All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Participation, Information and Democracy: When Do Low Turnout and Low Information Make a Difference - and Why?
Unformatted Document Text:  Participation, Information and Democracy: When Do Low Turnout and Low Information Make a Difference - and Why? Georg Lutz University of Berne, Switzerland Trinity College Dublin, Ireland e-mail: georg.## email not listed ## August 2003 Abstract Democracy is far from ideal in many countries these days: turnout is declining and/or is low, and vot-ers are often poorly informed. However, I argue in this paper that low turnout and low levels of infor-mation matter only if two conditions are fulfilled: (1) participation and information has to be socially discriminatory for some social groups and (2) the outcome of a vote is biased due to low turnout and low information of citizens in a way that outcomes would have been different if more citizens had participated and were better informed. The findings here confirm the generally known social factors that explain differences in turnout and differences in the level of information of voters to a great extent in the popular votes in Switzerland: better educated and more well to do people participate more and are better informed than poorer, less educated ones. In many of the analysed votes the outcome would have been different if non voters had participated and the badly informed would have become better informed however the lack of information seems to matter more than the level of participation. The government and the left wing parties would often have done better if citizens were better informed but the right wing parties would have done better if more citizens had voted. Several institutional variables can explain the bias: the issues in which people are relatively uninterested and find them difficult to understand, when turnout and information levels are low the risk of a turnout or information bias in-creases as well.

Authors: Lutz, Georg.
first   previous   Page 1 of 25   next   last



background image

Participation, Information and Democracy: When Do
Low Turnout and Low Information Make a Difference -
and Why?

Georg Lutz

University of Berne, Switzerland
Trinity College Dublin, Ireland


e-mail: georg.## email not listed ##


August 2003





Abstract
Democracy is far from ideal in many countries these days: turnout is declining and/or is low, and vot-
ers are often poorly informed. However, I argue in this paper that low turnout and low levels of infor-
mation matter only if two conditions are fulfilled: (1) participation and information has to be socially
discriminatory for some social groups and (2) the outcome of a vote is biased due to low turnout and
low information of citizens in a way that outcomes would have been different if more citizens had
participated and were better informed. The findings here confirm the generally known social factors
that explain differences in turnout and differences in the level of information of voters to a great extent
in the popular votes in Switzerland: better educated and more well to do people participate more and
are better informed than poorer, less educated ones. In many of the analysed votes the outcome would
have been different if non voters had participated and the badly informed would have become better
informed however the lack of information seems to matter more than the level of participation. The
government and the left wing parties would often have done better if citizens were better informed but
the right wing parties would have done better if more citizens had voted. Several institutional variables
can explain the bias: the issues in which people are relatively uninterested and find them difficult to
understand, when turnout and information levels are low the risk of a turnout or information bias in-
creases as well.


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 1 of 25   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.