Author's Keywords: Internet, Congress, elections, money and campaigns, mobilization, third-parties, World Wide Web, democracy, technology	Convention All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p62518_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Gulati, Girish. "CAMPAIGNING FOR CONGRESS ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR STRONG DEMOCRACY" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia Marriott Hotel, Philadelphia, PA, Aug 24, 2003 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p62518_index.html>

Gulati, G. J. , 2003-08-24 "CAMPAIGNING FOR CONGRESS ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR STRONG DEMOCRACY" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia Marriott Hotel, Philadelphia, PA Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p62518_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: The growing use and accessibility of the Internet has given political candidates an additional campaign tool for communicating directly with voters. While some scholars are excited about the Internet�s ability to promote �strong democracy,� others fear that it will further exacerbate existing inequalities among candidates and within the electorate. Who is more likely to campaign on the Internet? What kind of content are candidates displaying on their campaign websites? In order to answer these questions and offer some insights into which of the two possible scenarios of democracy are emerging, an extensive content analysis was performed of every campaign website that was launched for the 2002. Major-party candidates, well-financed candidates, candidates running in constituencies with higher Internet usage challengers, candidates from highly competitive constituencies were the most likely to campaign over the Web. With regard to content, a substantial number of candidates provided the public with insights into their personal background and their professional experience and were quite active in recruiting and mobilizing web users for their campaign. Candidates did not do well in providing information that would help expand the electorate and only a handful of candidates have taken advantage of the technological advances that could enhance the communication and interaction between candidates and citizens.

Online Campaigning in the 2002 U.S. Elections: Analyzing House, Senate and Gubernatorial Campaign Web Sites

The Potential of the Internet as a Campaign Tool: The Relationship Between Incumbency, Political Party, Election Outcomes and the Relative Quality of Campaign Websites