23
strictly naturalistic understanding of human beings as incapable of supporting
‘life’ as O’Connor and Percy. He may want to go beyond good and evil, to leave
Christianity behind, but he never wants to abandon the possibility of good and
bad. He does not believe that good and bad are simply pragmatic outcomes or
signs of mere strength [Kraft], although they would be in a purely materialist
world. Spiritualized force,
Macht, will to power channeled through Geist, art
and culture take the place of the divine for him.
To some, such a replacement for the divine will seem as rich and
meaningful as Enoch’s shrunken man. Can a body of thought that denies the
existence of a transcendent realm help to “quicken” modern life? This
question, I fear, will seem ludicrous to people serious about their religious
beliefs. It will seem one more instance of an intellectual pride that seeks to
beautify rather than do away with nihilism. Yet, modern life has hardened
hearts and heads to the faith that informs the work of O’Connor and Percy.
Given this hardening of hearts, it seems worth asking whether Nietzsche’s
immanent mysticism can tell us anything about the possibility of quickening
lives in a secular age. Having drawn a connection between O’Connor, Percy,
and Nietzsche by pointing to their attempts to reunite matter and spirit, I will,
however, leave this question for another day.
quicken Western man. Cf. Henry T. Edmondson III, Return to Good and Evil: Flannery
O’Connor’s Response to Nihilism (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2002), pp. 43-49.