Author's Keywords: race, presidential elections, candidate discourse	Convention All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p62799_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Sofen, Mindy. and Gross, Kimberly. "Talking in Black and White: How Presidential Candidates Appeal to Different Racial Audiences" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia Marriott Hotel, Philadelphia, PA, Aug 27, 2003 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p62799_index.html>

Sofen, M. J. and Gross, K. , 2003-08-27 "Talking in Black and White: How Presidential Candidates Appeal to Different Racial Audiences" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia Marriott Hotel, Philadelphia, PA Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p62799_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: We expand upon the race and campaign literature to look at how the dynamics of voting behavior and racial appeals play out in what the candidates themselves say on the campaign trail. Specifically, we analyze campaign speeches from three presidential elections, 1988, 1992 and 1996. We look at the speeches given by the candidates to determine whether candidates vary the issues they discuss or how they discuss them depending upon the race of their audience. Looking at discussion of crime, education, affirmative action, welfare, and taxes, we find that there is less variation in not only issues discussed, but also how they are discussed, to predominantly white, mixed, and predominantly black audiences.

Constructing Race in Campaign 2008: How Democratic Candidates Talked about Race During the PBS All-American Forum at Howard University

Different Strokes for Different Folks: Candidate Race and the Electoral Calculus of Black and White Voters