All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Talking in Black and White: How Presidential Candidates Appeal to Different Racial Audiences
Unformatted Document Text:  While the two parties began the 1964 presidential contest with few differences on issues of race, that campaign began to draw the lines of distinction between the parties’ views on race. Republican presidential nominee Barry Goldwater took his party to the right on racial issues, campaigning on a platform opposed to the Civil Rights Act (Goldwater voted against the bill in the Senate). Goldwater heavily courted white voters in the south, claiming that he was not a racist, but rather believed in states rights and non-intervention on issues of race by the federal government (Carmines and Stimpson, 1989). President Johnson, on the other hand, campaigned for continued racial equality and civil rights, turning his party to the left of where it had been just four years earlier. Through the 1964 election, the Democratic and Republican Parties distinguished themselves on issues of race, with an almost complete reversal of ideologies. Democrats were now seen as the party of inclusion and sympathy to the African American cause, while Republicans became the party of racial conservatism (Carmine & Stimson, 1989; Kinder & Sears, 1996; Mendelberg, 2001). The 1964 election had delineated the differences between the two parties, and those differences have only solidified since then (Kinder & Sears, 1996). By 1966, after the landmark 1965 Voting Rights Act was passed with full support from President Johnson, the Democratic Party found themselves increasingly relying on the African American vote at the polls (Bolce, De Maio & Muzzio, 1992; Sirgo, 1995; Thernstrom & Thernstrom, 1997; Barker, 1980). While the Democrats were gaining the expanding black vote, they lost support from white, mostly southern, conservatives on whom they used to rely. Because of this, the black vote became all the more important to Democratic presidential candidates. As several historians have noted, “black Americans had become a sizable and received challenges yet Democratic presidential candidates did little to push the party fearing the loss of southern votes.)

Authors: Sofen, Mindy. and Gross, Kimberly.
first   previous   Page 4 of 47   next   last



background image
While the two parties began the 1964 presidential contest with few differences on issues
of race, that campaign began to draw the lines of distinction between the parties’ views on race.
Republican presidential nominee Barry Goldwater took his party to the right on racial issues,
campaigning on a platform opposed to the Civil Rights Act (Goldwater voted against the bill in
the Senate). Goldwater heavily courted white voters in the south, claiming that he was not a
racist, but rather believed in states rights and non-intervention on issues of race by the federal
government (Carmines and Stimpson, 1989).
President Johnson, on the other hand, campaigned for continued racial equality and civil
rights, turning his party to the left of where it had been just four years earlier. Through the 1964
election, the Democratic and Republican Parties distinguished themselves on issues of race, with
an almost complete reversal of ideologies. Democrats were now seen as the party of inclusion
and sympathy to the African American cause, while Republicans became the party of racial
conservatism (Carmine & Stimson, 1989; Kinder & Sears, 1996; Mendelberg, 2001). The 1964
election had delineated the differences between the two parties, and those differences have only
solidified since then (Kinder & Sears, 1996).
By 1966, after the landmark 1965 Voting Rights Act was passed with full support from
President Johnson, the Democratic Party found themselves increasingly relying on the African
American vote at the polls (Bolce, De Maio & Muzzio, 1992; Sirgo, 1995; Thernstrom &
Thernstrom, 1997; Barker, 1980). While the Democrats were gaining the expanding black vote,
they lost support from white, mostly southern, conservatives on whom they used to rely.
Because of this, the black vote became all the more important to Democratic presidential
candidates. As several historians have noted, “black Americans had become a sizable and
received challenges yet Democratic presidential candidates did little to push the party fearing the loss of southern
votes.)


Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 4 of 47   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.