|
|
|
|
Between Hubris and Humility: Considerations on Cynicism as a Form of Democratic Faith |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
In her book, After Utopia, Judith Shklar argues that “since we know too little to feel justified in solid despair and we know too much to fall into even the slightest utopianism, a reasoned skepticism is the sanest attitude for the present.” Almost 50 years later, her defense of a reasoned skepticism remains relevant. Indeed it is hard to imagine any alternative attitude by which liberal democracy might withstand the fatalism, alienation and despair that corrupt our political actions and impoverish our moral commitments, without indulging the illusions of grandeur and ambitions of idealism that tempt us to pursue (and be disappointed in) utopian projects. And yet at the same time, however reasonable this skeptical stance is, it regularly comes under attack (or is experienced) as being inadequate to the task of defending and cultivating the liberal democratic commitments. How can reasoned skepticism give us enough to live by? What positive commitment or aspiration is affirmed by emphasizing the “uncertainty as to what we ought to do [and] a distrust of the value of what we do”? What remains worthy of our protracted efforts and what significance do those efforts retain, when we adopt the skeptical stance?
Motivated by these concerns, I wish to defend Shklar’s reasoned skepticism by embellishing it a bit, by considering the democratic commitments such a doubting and distrusting stance possesses and practices. To do this, I consider how democratic commitments encourage a kind of cynicism that chafes at both the hubris of democratic idealism and the humility of democratic resignation in order to examine how Shklar’s reasoned skepticism might be transformed into a positive, even passionate, commitment to democratic ideals that is expressed in a way that guards against both the danger of dogmatism and despondency. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
cynic (215), individu (41), self (40), democrat (33), may (31), way (29), rather (29), democraci (27), moral (24), live (24), life (23), belief (23), give (22), us (20), ideal (20), commit (20), one (19), practic (18), tempera (18), citizen (17), aspir (16), |
Author's Keywords:
|
Tocqueville, Emerson, Shklar, William James, Reinhold Niebuhr, individualism |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Dutton, Denise. "Between Hubris and Humility: Considerations on Cynicism as a Form of Democratic Faith" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia Marriott Hotel, Philadelphia, PA, Aug 27, 2003 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p62942_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Dutton, D. , 2003-08-27 "Between Hubris and Humility: Considerations on Cynicism as a Form of Democratic Faith" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia Marriott Hotel, Philadelphia, PA Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p62942_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: In her book, After Utopia, Judith Shklar argues that “since we know too little to feel justified in solid despair and we know too much to fall into even the slightest utopianism, a reasoned skepticism is the sanest attitude for the present.” Almost 50 years later, her defense of a reasoned skepticism remains relevant. Indeed it is hard to imagine any alternative attitude by which liberal democracy might withstand the fatalism, alienation and despair that corrupt our political actions and impoverish our moral commitments, without indulging the illusions of grandeur and ambitions of idealism that tempt us to pursue (and be disappointed in) utopian projects. And yet at the same time, however reasonable this skeptical stance is, it regularly comes under attack (or is experienced) as being inadequate to the task of defending and cultivating the liberal democratic commitments. How can reasoned skepticism give us enough to live by? What positive commitment or aspiration is affirmed by emphasizing the “uncertainty as to what we ought to do [and] a distrust of the value of what we do”? What remains worthy of our protracted efforts and what significance do those efforts retain, when we adopt the skeptical stance?
Motivated by these concerns, I wish to defend Shklar’s reasoned skepticism by embellishing it a bit, by considering the democratic commitments such a doubting and distrusting stance possesses and practices. To do this, I consider how democratic commitments encourage a kind of cynicism that chafes at both the hubris of democratic idealism and the humility of democratic resignation in order to examine how Shklar’s reasoned skepticism might be transformed into a positive, even passionate, commitment to democratic ideals that is expressed in a way that guards against both the danger of dogmatism and despondency. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.PDF |
| Page count: |
29 |
| Word count: |
8311 |
| Text sample: |
| Between Hubris and Humility: Considerations on Cynicism as a Form of Democratic Faith Denise Dutton Southwest Missouri State University Springfield MO Prepared for delivery at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association August 28 - August 31 2003. Copyright by the American Political Science Association. This is a working draft presented as a poster session; please do not cite without the author’s permission. INTRODUCTION Cynicism as Civic Distemper and Democratic Sensibility This dissertation is inspired by |
| scorn despondency even misanthropy. And seeing how the cynic might hold out hope reminds us that part of the art of free citizenship is contesting the notion of what counts as a good citizen. In showing how the cynical disposition is neither at one with nor antithetical to democratic self-government these thinkers’ considerations of cynicism remind us of those extraordinary ethical difficulties we face in articulating and pursuing the goals worthy of a free people.34 This is a daunting |
Similar Titles:
Emerson's Poetic Democracy: Rejection, Reflection, Representation, and the Emergence of the Self-Reliant Individual
Democracy and the Individual: Emerson's Urgent Call to Self-Reliance
Teaching a Process for Citizen Responsibility and Social Justice: From Individual Morality to Political Legitimacy
|
|