All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Understanding Public Support for the U.S. Bureaucracy: A Macro Politics View
Unformatted Document Text:  17 media coverage. This stands in marked contrast with other bureaucratic reforms, such as the first President Bush’s establishment of the Competitiveness Council. While the Competitiveness Council may actually have had more impact on the policies and regulations promulgated by agencies, its influence was not widely appreciated beyond the beltway. We expect the Grace and Gore Commissions to have had two distinct effects on public perceptions of bureaucratic performance. First, media attention to the release of the War on Waste: President’s Private Sector on Cost Control (Grace 1984) and the Gore Report on Reinventing Government (1993) should have had an initially negative impact on public perceptions. Both reports start from a premise that something is very wrong and it needs to be fixed. However, both then propose remedies to address these failures. Their implementation was inevitably partial, incomplete, and staggered over years. Moreover, the specific reforms associated with the reports were almost certainly well below the radar screen of most of the public. Still, it seems fair to assume that presidents do not publicize such reports so as to permanently discredit their handling of the bureaucracy. Rather, they initiate the reforms to reassure the public that they are in-charge of a well-functioning – and well- controlled – policy machine. Thus, public approval of bureaucracy should increase following the initial dip in public perceptions resulting from the issuance of the two reports. We operationalize the first of these two distinct expectations using a dummy variable scored one for the initial year in which the reports were issued, 1984 and 1993, respectively. The two dummies should generate negative signs. The second effect is operationalized as a counter variable (1, 2, 3,…) beginning in the year following the issuing of the report and continuing for the remainder of the president’s time in office. The counter variables should generate positive estimates. Given the more constraining tone of the Grace Commission and the more energizing approach of the Gore Report, separate dummies and counters are used for each of the two reform efforts. We also examine an alternative specification in which we test for an initial shock associated with the release of the reports and then assess how those shocks decay over four years. Findings We utilize a lagged dependent variable specification to take into account the inertia in the

Authors: Yackee, Susan. and Lowery, David.
first   previous   Page 19 of 36   next   last



background image

17
media coverage. This stands in marked contrast with other bureaucratic reforms, such as the first
President Bush’s establishment of the Competitiveness Council. While the Competitiveness Council may
actually have had more impact on the policies and regulations promulgated by agencies, its influence was
not widely appreciated beyond the beltway. We expect the Grace and Gore Commissions to have had two
distinct effects on public perceptions of bureaucratic performance. First, media attention to the release of
the War on Waste: President’s Private Sector on Cost Control (Grace 1984) and the Gore Report on
Reinventing Government (1993) should have had an initially negative impact on public perceptions. Both
reports start from a premise that something is very wrong and it needs to be fixed. However, both then
propose remedies to address these failures. Their implementation was inevitably partial, incomplete, and
staggered over years. Moreover, the specific reforms associated with the reports were almost certainly
well below the radar screen of most of the public. Still, it seems fair to assume that presidents do not
publicize such reports so as to permanently discredit their handling of the bureaucracy. Rather, they
initiate the reforms to reassure the public that they are in-charge of a well-functioning – and well-
controlled – policy machine. Thus, public approval of bureaucracy should increase following the initial
dip in public perceptions resulting from the issuance of the two reports. We operationalize the first of
these two distinct expectations using a dummy variable scored one for the initial year in which the reports
were issued, 1984 and 1993, respectively. The two dummies should generate negative signs. The second
effect is operationalized as a counter variable (1, 2, 3,…) beginning in the year following the issuing of
the report and continuing for the remainder of the president’s time in office. The counter variables should
generate positive estimates. Given the more constraining tone of the Grace Commission and the more
energizing approach of the Gore Report, separate dummies and counters are used for each of the two
reform efforts. We also examine an alternative specification in which we test for an initial shock
associated with the release of the reports and then assess how those shocks decay over four years.
Findings
We utilize a lagged dependent variable specification to take into account the inertia in the


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 19 of 36   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.