All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Learning and Talking about Politics: Gender Dynamics, Interaction and Success in NFL Model Congress
Unformatted Document Text:  7 Research Setting Data come from the 2001 John C. Stennis National Student Congress sponsored by the National Forensic League (NFL), the governing association for high school and collegiate speech and debate competitions. The mock legislative debate competition was held over five days in Oklahoma City in June 2001 and attracted 425 participants from 42 different states. Participants qualified for the national event by competing in state-level competitions, where the number of participants advancing to the national tournament depends not on the population of the state but rather upon the number of students involved in state-level legislative debate contests. For example, Nevada sent nine competitors while New York sent ten. More than one third of the competitors come from states with large populations or close proximity to the competition site: Texas (40), California (36), Missouri (28), Kansas (25), Colorado (20), and Florida (17). Most participants are high school seniors and juniors, though a handful are high school sophomores. Rounds of legislative debate operate under strict rules of procedure that encourage participation, insure equal opportunity to speak, and require broad-based involvement. All participants compete in the two-day preliminary round of competition, and then based on their scores, the top 25 percent of the participants advance to two days of semi-final rounds. The 25 percent with the highest scores in semi-finals are selected for the one-day final round. Ultimately, nine top finishers are designated. In each round, participants are grouped randomly with approximately 24 other students for purposes of engaging in debate. All contestants are provided with resolutions in advance of the competition in order to do research and prepare speeches. At the competition, speakers are allocated three minutes per turn, and speeches must

Authors: Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. and Rosenthal, James.
first   previous   Page 9 of 28   next   last



background image
7
Research Setting
Data come from the 2001 John C. Stennis National Student Congress sponsored by
the National Forensic League (NFL), the governing association for high school and
collegiate speech and debate competitions. The mock legislative debate competition was
held over five days in Oklahoma City in June 2001 and attracted 425 participants from 42
different states. Participants qualified for the national event by competing in state-level
competitions, where the number of participants advancing to the national tournament depends
not on the population of the state but rather upon the number of students involved in state-level
legislative debate contests. For example, Nevada sent nine competitors while New York sent ten.
More than one third of the competitors come from states with large populations or close
proximity to the competition site: Texas (40), California (36), Missouri (28), Kansas (25),
Colorado (20), and Florida (17). Most participants are high school seniors and juniors, though a
handful are high school sophomores.
Rounds of legislative debate operate under strict rules of procedure that encourage
participation, insure equal opportunity to speak, and require broad-based involvement. All
participants compete in the two-day preliminary round of competition, and then based on their
scores, the top 25 percent of the participants advance to two days of semi-final rounds. The 25
percent with the highest scores in semi-finals are selected for the one-day final round.
Ultimately, nine top finishers are designated. In each round, participants are grouped randomly
with approximately 24 other students for purposes of engaging in debate. All contestants are
provided with resolutions in advance of the competition in order to do research and prepare
speeches. At the competition, speakers are allocated three minutes per turn, and speeches must


Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 9 of 28   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.