All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Participatory Technology Assessment for Reflexive Design
Unformatted Document Text:  19 was that, after all discussions on short term problems, time did not permit to test extensively to what extent the vision indeed made sense in the eyes of stakeholders of different backgrounds. Project 3: Family housing in a organic pig raising In order to deal with animal welfare and health concerns, to fit farms better into the landscape and to reduce emissions due to manure and transportation, this project aimed to design biological animal housing facilities and a biological chain for pig keeping. Other objectives were to collect, develop and integrate knowledge, and to bring about interactions between a variety of stakeholders. (Donkers, 2001) The project team comprised several co-producers, including Nutreco (a processing firm), who initially was the leading stakeholder. The project started with a workshop where farmers, knowledge workers and Nutreco constructively discussed opportunities for the project to contribute to a sustainable pig farming chain. Much less attention was devoted to short term problems than in the poultry project, the main exception being a discussion - induced by the project team rather than participating stakeholders - on dealing with prize competition. After this first workshop, Nutreco stopped being the primus inter pares among the involved actors, since others appeared less interested in answering the specific research question Nutreco had been interested in experimental data rather than deskstudies. (Aarnink, 2001) Subsequently, the project focused on the design of long term visions. Several workshops and creativity sessions were held, and in addition farmers were consulted during visits at their homes on the ideas drafted by the knowledge workers. The project team succeeded in creating significant commitment amongst farmers for actively contributing to that effort, and these farmers appeared to have clear ideas on the long term. "Pig farmers from [the provinces of] Limburg and Overijssel showed strikingly many parallels. They have then taken leadership in the project."

Authors: Grin, John.
first   previous   Page 19 of 33   next   last



background image
19
was that, after all discussions on short term problems, time did not permit to test extensively to
what extent the vision indeed made sense in the eyes of stakeholders of different backgrounds.
Project 3: Family housing in a organic pig raising
In order to deal with animal welfare and health concerns, to fit farms better into the landscape
and to reduce emissions due to manure and transportation, this project aimed to design biological
animal housing facilities and a biological chain for pig keeping. Other objectives were to collect,
develop and integrate knowledge, and to bring about interactions between a variety of
stakeholders. (Donkers, 2001) The project team comprised several co-producers, including
Nutreco (a processing firm), who initially was the leading stakeholder.
The project started with a workshop where farmers, knowledge workers and Nutreco
constructively discussed opportunities for the project to contribute to a sustainable pig farming
chain. Much less attention was devoted to short term problems than in the poultry project, the
main exception being a discussion - induced by the project team rather than participating
stakeholders - on dealing with prize competition. After this first workshop, Nutreco stopped
being the primus inter pares among the involved actors, since others appeared less interested in
answering the specific research question Nutreco had been interested in experimental data rather
than deskstudies. (Aarnink, 2001)
Subsequently, the project focused on the design of long term visions. Several workshops and
creativity sessions were held, and in addition farmers were consulted during visits at their homes
on the ideas drafted by the knowledge workers. The project team succeeded in creating
significant commitment amongst farmers for actively contributing to that effort, and these
farmers appeared to have clear ideas on the long term. "Pig farmers from [the provinces of] Limburg and
Overijssel showed strikingly many parallels. They have then taken leadership in the project."


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 19 of 33   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.