 |
Sexual Diversity and Public Schools in Canada and the United States
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
7
(15-19) found that 89 percent of them considered the idea of homosexual activity disgusting.
4
In such a context, openly lesbian or gay students often report considerable acceptance from peers. This will sometime include active support form close friends, but a form of passive tolerance from others. One Chicago high school student has commented that acceptance is often not deep: “you’re not being shoved, pushed and beaten. You’re just kind of that elephant in the living room that no one wants to talk about.”
5
Another student, in Oakland California, has observed
that while the concept of homosexuality is accepted at his school, there are no openly gay couples – “you can’t do anything in public and be accepted.”
6
Where there is actively negative reaction, it will often be most evident in sports circles. It is there that deviation from heterosexuality is policed most aggressively, intensified by anxieties about same-sex physical contact, change rooms, and showers. Lesbian and gay students will often report avoiding areas where jocks – particularly male jocks – hang out. Far outside such environments, however, the words “fag,” “lesbian,” “dyke,” and especially “gay” are routinely flung about as insults. Every study of school climate ever undertaken in either country has found pervasive anti-gay language at all age levels.
ACTIVISM ON MANY BOTH SIDES
There is a decades-long history of sexual diversity activism on schools issues, but much quickened in the 1990s and early 2000s. In the 1970s, there were only isolated challenges to the prevailing patterns of inattention, silence, and punishment. The earliest activism was often in the form of students and teachers simply being out when few were out, and when the risks of punishment or job loss were substantial. In other cases, teachers took it on themselves to incorporate sexual diversity into their lessons and counsellors into their day-to-day work. A few teachers who were fired fought back, and their cause became a rallying point for fledgling gay and lesbian organizations. But such groups often had many fronts to mobilize for, so their engagement with schooling was episodic.
In the 1980s, educators and students in a widely scattered centres across the continent began to organize networks to press for change. A few teacher unions in Canada and the U.S. were persuaded to defend members who were punished or fired for being gay or for speaking out on sexual diversity issues, though it would not be until the 1990s when the educational sector of the labour movements of Canada and the U.S. became more systematically outspoken on sexual diversity. Students – of all sexual orientations – became prominent critics of school inattention to these issues, and by their personal testimonies about school climate shook the complacency of many school officials. It was also in the 1990s that progressive activist groups outside the educational realm began taking on schools issues.
Canada
There was little sustained activism on schooling anywhere in Canada before the late 1980s, though two earlier cases of discrimination against gay teachers before then – one in
|
| |
| |
|
|
7
(15-19) found that 89 percent of them considered the idea of homosexual activity disgusting.
4
In such a context, openly lesbian or gay students often report considerable acceptance from peers. This will sometime include active support form close friends, but a form of passive tolerance from others. One Chicago high school student has commented that acceptance is often not deep: “you’re not being shoved, pushed and beaten. You’re just kind of that elephant in the living room that no one wants to talk about.”
5
Another student, in Oakland California, has observed
that while the concept of homosexuality is accepted at his school, there are no openly gay couples – “you can’t do anything in public and be accepted.”
6
Where there is actively negative reaction, it will often be most evident in sports circles. It is there that deviation from heterosexuality is policed most aggressively, intensified by anxieties about same-sex physical contact, change rooms, and showers. Lesbian and gay students will often report avoiding areas where jocks – particularly male jocks – hang out. Far outside such environments, however, the words “fag,” “lesbian,” “dyke,” and especially “gay” are routinely flung about as insults. Every study of school climate ever undertaken in either country has found pervasive anti-gay language at all age levels.
ACTIVISM ON MANY BOTH SIDES
There is a decades-long history of sexual diversity activism on schools issues, but much quickened in the 1990s and early 2000s. In the 1970s, there were only isolated challenges to the prevailing patterns of inattention, silence, and punishment. The earliest activism was often in the form of students and teachers simply being out when few were out, and when the risks of punishment or job loss were substantial. In other cases, teachers took it on themselves to incorporate sexual diversity into their lessons and counsellors into their day-to-day work. A few teachers who were fired fought back, and their cause became a rallying point for fledgling gay and lesbian organizations. But such groups often had many fronts to mobilize for, so their engagement with schooling was episodic.
In the 1980s, educators and students in a widely scattered centres across the continent began to organize networks to press for change. A few teacher unions in Canada and the U.S. were persuaded to defend members who were punished or fired for being gay or for speaking out on sexual diversity issues, though it would not be until the 1990s when the educational sector of the labour movements of Canada and the U.S. became more systematically outspoken on sexual diversity. Students – of all sexual orientations – became prominent critics of school inattention to these issues, and by their personal testimonies about school climate shook the complacency of many school officials. It was also in the 1990s that progressive activist groups outside the educational realm began taking on schools issues.
Canada
There was little sustained activism on schooling anywhere in Canada before the late 1980s, though two earlier cases of discrimination against gay teachers before then – one in
|
|
Convention | | Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|