All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Feedback Loops and Group Politics in Historical Institutionalist Analysis: Courts, Public Policy and Lesbian and Gay Organizing in Canada
Unformatted Document Text:  1 On June 10, 2003, Michael Leshner and Michael Stark tied the knot at Toronto City Hall. Exchanging kisses and sipping champagne in front of television cameras from around the world, Leshner and Stark were the first in a steady stream of same sex couples – including visitors to Toronto from across Canada, the U.S., Europe and even China – who made the trek to city hall for a marriage license, following a ruling from an Ontario court that legalized same sex marriage in Canada’s most populous province (Tyler and Huffman, 2003). In the days that followed, the federal government proposed legislation that would legalize same sex marriage across Canada. These developments put Canada in the forefront of the world in the recognition of lesbian and gay rights. Only two other countries – Belgium and the Netherlands – recognize same sex marriage (Wintemute and Andenæs, 2001). Moreover, Canada offers broad and deep human rights protections for lesbians and gay men, including measures that still do not exist in many parts of the developed world, such as enforceable protection from employment and housing discrimination; employment benefits for same sex partners in the public and private sectors; adoption rights for lesbians and gays in many provinces; family rights with respect to health care decision-making and wills; and special sentencing provisions in criminal law for crimes motivated by hate on the grounds of sexual orientation. This paper argues that Canada’s trailblazing efforts to promote the human rights of lesbian and gay citizens can be traced to the impact of the growth of judicial power on public policy outcomes. Political-institutional change in advanced capitalist democracies provide opportunities for assessing the effects of institutions on political debate and policy development. While the real world does not provide many cases in which other factors remain constant while political institutions change, certain historical situations may approximate this ideal closely enough that they provide an opportunity for a longitudinal

Authors: Smith, Miriam.
first   previous   Page 2 of 43   next   last



background image
1
On June 10, 2003, Michael Leshner and Michael Stark tied the knot at Toronto City
Hall. Exchanging kisses and sipping champagne in front of television cameras from around
the world, Leshner and Stark were the first in a steady stream of same sex couples –
including visitors to Toronto from across Canada, the U.S., Europe and even China – who
made the trek to city hall for a marriage license, following a ruling from an Ontario court
that legalized same sex marriage in Canada’s most populous province (Tyler and Huffman,
2003). In the days that followed, the federal government proposed legislation that would
legalize same sex marriage across Canada. These developments put Canada in the forefront
of the world in the recognition of lesbian and gay rights. Only two other countries – Belgium
and the Netherlands – recognize same sex marriage (Wintemute and Andenæs, 2001).
Moreover, Canada offers broad and deep human rights protections for lesbians and gay men,
including measures that still do not exist in many parts of the developed world, such as
enforceable protection from employment and housing discrimination; employment benefits
for same sex partners in the public and private sectors; adoption rights for lesbians and gays
in many provinces; family rights with respect to health care decision-making and wills; and
special sentencing provisions in criminal law for crimes motivated by hate on the grounds of
sexual orientation. This paper argues that Canada’s trailblazing efforts to promote the human
rights of lesbian and gay citizens can be traced to the impact of the growth of judicial power
on public policy outcomes.
Political-institutional change in advanced capitalist democracies provide
opportunities for assessing the effects of institutions on political debate and policy
development. While the real world does not provide many cases in which other factors
remain constant while political institutions change, certain historical situations may
approximate this ideal closely enough that they provide an opportunity for a longitudinal


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 2 of 43   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.