All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

A Particular Universality: Crimes Against Humanity and Universal Jurisdiction in Domestic Courts
Unformatted Document Text:  2 international criminal law, how is universal jurisdiction for crimes against humanity being exercised? Are we able to provide justice to victims of crimes against humanity on the basis of the mere humanity? Or do attempts to punish crimes against humanity face the same problem that Hannah Arendt identified concerning the attempt to prevent crimes against humanity, which is that “the Rights of Man, supposedly inalienable, proved to be unenforceable” 3 ? In cases of crimes against humanity, do victims and plaintiffs have to rely on an effective citizenship, meaning membership in “a community willing and able to guarantee any rights whatsoever” 4 ? Two basic paths for the prosecution of crimes against humanity abroad have evolved: international tribunals and the emerging International Criminal Court (ICC), on the one hand, and trials in third countries under universal jurisdiction, on the other hand. Since the international tribunals ad hoc institutions with limited mandates, and the ICC has not started its work yet, I will not examine this path. The second path for international justice is prosecution in third countries. I will examine trials in third countries in order to assess the current achievements and limits in prosecuting crimes against humanity. How did the courts handle the issues of universal jurisdiction and crimes against humanity, and how can universalistic and parochial factors explain the emergence and outcome of these particular trials? By analyzing some of the few trial that took place, I will locate the mechanisms that prevent numerous other cases of crimes against humanity from being prosecuted. The broader question is whether crimes that are conceptualized as an offense to humanity at large are coherently prosecuted through mechanisms that rely on states. ‘Crimes against humanity’ are the supreme offense on paper. Yet the reliance on national courts often 3 Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism [1951] (San Diego & New York: Harcourt Brace & Company, 1973), 293. 4 Ibid., 297.

Authors: Wilke, Christiane.
first   previous   Page 3 of 32   next   last



background image
2
international criminal law, how is universal jurisdiction for crimes against humanity being
exercised? Are we able to provide justice to victims of crimes against humanity on the basis
of the mere humanity? Or do attempts to punish crimes against humanity face the same
problem that Hannah Arendt identified concerning the attempt to prevent crimes against
humanity, which is that “the Rights of Man, supposedly inalienable, proved to be
unenforceable”
3
? In cases of crimes against humanity, do victims and plaintiffs have to rely
on an effective citizenship, meaning membership in “a community willing and able to
guarantee any rights whatsoever”
4
?
Two basic paths for the prosecution of crimes against humanity abroad have
evolved: international tribunals and the emerging International Criminal Court (ICC), on the
one hand, and trials in third countries under universal jurisdiction, on the other hand. Since
the international tribunals ad hoc institutions with limited mandates, and the ICC has not
started its work yet, I will not examine this path. The second path for international justice is
prosecution in third countries. I will examine trials in third countries in order to assess the
current achievements and limits in prosecuting crimes against humanity. How did the courts
handle the issues of universal jurisdiction and crimes against humanity, and how can
universalistic and parochial factors explain the emergence and outcome of these particular
trials? By analyzing some of the few trial that took place, I will locate the mechanisms that
prevent numerous other cases of crimes against humanity from being prosecuted. The
broader question is whether crimes that are conceptualized as an offense to humanity at
large are coherently prosecuted through mechanisms that rely on states. ‘Crimes against
humanity’ are the supreme offense on paper. Yet the reliance on national courts often
3
Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism [1951] (San Diego & New York: Harcourt Brace & Company,
1973), 293.
4
Ibid., 297.


Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 3 of 32   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.