All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Identity or Status? Struggles over 'Recognition' in Fraser, Honneth and Taylor
Unformatted Document Text:  “Identity or Status?” 7/17/03 Page 18 These worries should be familiar from the now extensive literature on recent social movements and struggles for the recognition of differences across and amongst groups based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexuality, ability, age, nationality, etc. The mistakes and simplifications of some forms of identity politics—and some forms of theory construction about recognition—that Fraser is worried about here all result, I believe, from an authenticity model of group formation and identification. Fraser recapitulates these errors of the politics of authentic group identity: groups are taken to be all-encompassing, internally undifferentiated collectivities holistically closed off to one another; identity-constitutive characteristics are reified as cutting reality at its essential joints, rather than as reflecting contingent, historical practices of human distinction and discrimination; groups are taken to have an authentic character which all members should seek to emulate and foster, thus encouraging intra-group conformity and illiberal pressures on “inauthentic” members; the internal politics of active group self-definition is closed off from view behind the cover of an appeal to the pre-existing “genuine” group identity; inter-group separatism and conflict is encouraged since the definition of authentic identity is constructed through invidious comparisons with other groups; and finally, politics aims at the recognition and protection of groups themselves as distinctive, rather than at the protection of the equal opportunity of individuals to be recognized independently of subordinating cultural values. This particular conglomeration of ideas about group identity has its heritage in German Romanticism and nineteenth century nationalist movements, with their jargons of authenticity imported into recent debates about identity politics. If Fraser is right that the identity model of recognition is inseparable from these features of the authenticity framework, then she is right, I think, to consign the identity model to the scrap heap.

Authors: Zurn, Christopher.
first   previous   Page 19 of 33   next   last



background image
“Identity or Status?”
7/17/03
Page 18
These worries should be familiar from the now extensive literature on recent social
movements and struggles for the recognition of differences across and amongst groups
based on ethnicity, race, gender, sexuality, ability, age, nationality, etc.
The mistakes and simplifications of some forms of identity politics—and some
forms of theory construction about recognition—that Fraser is worried about here all
result, I believe, from an authenticity model of group formation and identification. Fraser
recapitulates these errors of the politics of authentic group identity: groups are taken to be
all-encompassing, internally undifferentiated collectivities holistically closed off to one
another; identity-constitutive characteristics are reified as cutting reality at its essential
joints, rather than as reflecting contingent, historical practices of human distinction and
discrimination; groups are taken to have an authentic character which all members should
seek to emulate and foster, thus encouraging intra-group conformity and illiberal
pressures on “inauthentic” members; the internal politics of active group self-definition is
closed off from view behind the cover of an appeal to the pre-existing “genuine” group
identity; inter-group separatism and conflict is encouraged since the definition of
authentic identity is constructed through invidious comparisons with other groups; and
finally, politics aims at the recognition and protection of groups themselves as distinctive,
rather than at the protection of the equal opportunity of individuals to be recognized
independently of subordinating cultural values. This particular conglomeration of ideas
about group identity has its heritage in German Romanticism and nineteenth century
nationalist movements, with their jargons of authenticity imported into recent debates
about identity politics. If Fraser is right that the identity model of recognition is
inseparable from these features of the authenticity framework, then she is right, I think, to
consign the identity model to the scrap heap.


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 19 of 33   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.