1
ABSTRACT
My paper focuses on how identities, emotions and reason have affected the same-sex
marriage debates. I proceed as follows. Drawing on political theory and social psychology,
Part I explains how identity politics in general can threaten the democratic nature of political
discussion. Part II outlines the specific issues at stake in debates over same-sex marriage.
Part III describes my analysis of “letters to the editor” as a form of public discourse and
communication. Part IV reports my findings about “identity talk”, emotions and reason in the
same-sex marriage debate. Here, I identify two distinct lines of reasoning among the
opponents of same-sex marriage, one emphasizing sexuality and the other gender. Finally,
Part V summarizes the lessons emerging from my empirical analysis about democratic
discussion, identity politics and same-sex marriage.