All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

THE COLOR OF THE CAMPAIGN: A Quasi-Experimental Study of the Influence of Skin Color on Candidate Evaluation
Unformatted Document Text:  W EAVER 3 The Color of the Campaign Very little research has explored the low incidence of black candidates, successful and unsuccessful, for statewide office. Citrin, Green, and Sears analyzed how racial attitudes of whites influenced their voting in the 1982 gubernatorial election in California between Tom Bradley and George Deukmejian, finding that “the impact of a candidate’s race on voting depends on a number of contextual factors.” 3 They conclude that Bradley’s race did not encourage racially motivated voting behavior any greater than that observed in the races with white candidates (racial attitudes affected support for white candidates perceived to be more liberal on race issues). The study implied that liberal white candidates were just as likely to be similarly punished by voters who were resentful over the governments perceived preferential policies. This study had several major problems, the primary one being that they compared races with black candidates for different levels of elected office (governor, superintendent). Related work explores the extent of racial crossover voting and the conditions under which black candidates can attract white votes. An early study analyzed over fifty biracial election contests in Atlanta. White voters were more likely to vote for black candidates if they were incumbents or had the backing of local newspapers. Black incumbents were almost three times as likely non-incumbent black candidates (challenger and open-seat contestants) to receive the support of white voters. 4 Other work suggests that partisan voting is diminished in an election with a black candidate. 5 Racial, not partisan, difference is the primary factor explaining the variance in support for black candidacies. Race, not party, was also the most important 3 Citrin, Jack, Donald Philip Green, and David O. Sears. “White Reactions to Black Candidates: When Does Race Matter?” Public Opinion Quarterly 54:1 (Spring, 1990), 74-96. 4 Bullock, Charles S., III. “Racial Crossover Voting and the Election of Black Officials,” Journal of Politics 46:1 (Feb. 1984). 5 Lieske, Joel and Jan William Hillard. “The Racial Factor in Urban Elections,” The Western Political Quarterly 37:4 (Dec. 1984): 545-563.

Authors: Weaver, Vesla.
first   previous   Page 3 of 58   next   last



background image
W
EAVER
3
The Color of the Campaign
Very little research has explored the low incidence of black candidates, successful and
unsuccessful, for statewide office. Citrin, Green, and Sears analyzed how racial attitudes of
whites influenced their voting in the 1982 gubernatorial election in California between Tom
Bradley and George Deukmejian, finding that “the impact of a candidate’s race on voting
depends on a number of contextual factors.”
They conclude that Bradley’s race did not
encourage racially motivated voting behavior any greater than that observed in the races with
white candidates (racial attitudes affected support for white candidates perceived to be more
liberal on race issues). The study implied that liberal white candidates were just as likely to be
similarly punished by voters who were resentful over the governments perceived preferential
policies. This study had several major problems, the primary one being that they compared races
with black candidates for different levels of elected office (governor, superintendent).
Related work explores the extent of racial crossover voting and the conditions under
which black candidates can attract white votes. An early study analyzed over fifty biracial
election contests in Atlanta. White voters were more likely to vote for black candidates if they
were incumbents or had the backing of local newspapers. Black incumbents were almost three
times as likely non-incumbent black candidates (challenger and open-seat contestants) to receive
the support of white voters.
Other work suggests that partisan voting is diminished in an
election with a black candidate.
Racial, not partisan, difference is the primary factor explaining
the variance in support for black candidacies. Race, not party, was also the most important
3
Citrin, Jack, Donald Philip Green, and David O. Sears. “White Reactions to Black Candidates: When Does Race
Matter?” Public Opinion Quarterly 54:1 (Spring, 1990), 74-96.
4
Bullock, Charles S., III. “Racial Crossover Voting and the Election of Black Officials,” Journal of Politics 46:1
(Feb. 1984).
5
Lieske, Joel and Jan William Hillard. “The Racial Factor in Urban Elections,” The Western Political Quarterly
37:4 (Dec. 1984): 545-563.


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 3 of 58   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.