All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

THE COLOR OF THE CAMPAIGN: A Quasi-Experimental Study of the Influence of Skin Color on Candidate Evaluation
Unformatted Document Text:  W EAVER 4 The Color of the Campaign factor determining campaign contributions for black candidates in a study of Charlotte, North Carolina. 6 Other studies have focused on white attitudes on racial policies. 7 Hajnal’s study examines the racial attitudes and policy preferences of whites prior to and after the election of a black mayor, finding that racially tolerant attitudes among whites increase under black leadership. In addition, white voting behavior changes after a black mayoralty, with whites more willing to vote for a black candidate. 8 They hypothesize that racialized voting is a product of whites uncertainty and low information about how blacks will perform once in office. Therefore, white voters don’t have any information but racial stereotypes to go on. 9 However, when the black challenger becomes an incumbent in succeeding elections opposition to black officials greatly diminishes because they now have a record in office. The experimental studies that have dealt with the impact of the race of a candidate on voting have also been problematic. Most are based on non-probability samples like students on college campuses that have little external validity. The experimental analyses are marred by another defect; they all use candidate descriptions rather than visual stimuli. Visual stimuli are stronger manipulations, 10 especially given that in the real world a candidate’s race is more “readily discernable” than other characteristics like religion. 11 Most expose subjects to only one candidate 12 ; absent a referential candidate, extrapolating conclusions based on levels of support 6 Arrington, Theodore and Gerald L. Ingalls. “Race and Campaign Finance in Charlotte, N.C.” The Western Political Quarterly 37:4 (Dec. 1984): 578-583. 7 Gilens, Martin. “’Race coding’ and white opposition to welfare,” American Political Science Review (1996) 90:593-604. See also Alvarez, R. Michael and John Brehm. “Are Americans Ambivalent Towards Racial Policies?” American Journal of Political Science 41:2 (Apr. 1997): 345-374. 8 Hajnal, Zoltan. “White residents, Black incumbents, and a declining racial divide,” American Political Science Review 95:3 (Sept.2001), 603-617. 9 Ibid. 10 Gilens, Martin. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy.” Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999. 11 Bullock. 12 Terkildsen. See also Sigelman, et al.

Authors: Weaver, Vesla.
first   previous   Page 4 of 58   next   last



background image
W
EAVER
4
The Color of the Campaign
factor determining campaign contributions for black candidates in a study of Charlotte, North
Carolina.
Other studies have focused on white attitudes on racial policies.
Hajnal’s study
examines the racial attitudes and policy preferences of whites prior to and after the election of a
black mayor, finding that racially tolerant attitudes among whites increase under black
leadership. In addition, white voting behavior changes after a black mayoralty, with whites more
willing to vote for a black candidate.
They hypothesize that racialized voting is a product of
whites uncertainty and low information about how blacks will perform once in office. Therefore,
white voters don’t have any information but racial stereotypes to go on.
However, when the
black challenger becomes an incumbent in succeeding elections opposition to black officials
greatly diminishes because they now have a record in office.
The experimental studies that have dealt with the impact of the race of a candidate on
voting have also been problematic. Most are based on non-probability samples like students on
college campuses that have little external validity. The experimental analyses are marred by
another defect; they all use candidate descriptions rather than visual stimuli. Visual stimuli are
stronger manipulations,
especially given that in the real world a candidate’s race is more
“readily discernable” than other characteristics like religion.
Most expose subjects to only one
candidate
; absent a referential candidate, extrapolating conclusions based on levels of support
6
Arrington, Theodore and Gerald L. Ingalls. “Race and Campaign Finance in Charlotte, N.C.” The Western
Political Quarterly 37:4 (Dec. 1984): 578-583.
7
Gilens, Martin. “’Race coding’ and white opposition to welfare,” American Political Science Review (1996)
90:593-604. See also Alvarez, R. Michael and John Brehm. “Are Americans Ambivalent Towards Racial
Policies?” American Journal of Political Science 41:2 (Apr. 1997): 345-374.
8
Hajnal, Zoltan. “White residents, Black incumbents, and a declining racial divide,” American Political Science
Review 95:3 (Sept.2001), 603-617.
9
Ibid.
10
Gilens, Martin. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy.” Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, 1999.
11
Bullock.
12
Terkildsen. See also Sigelman, et al.


Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 4 of 58   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.