 |
Candidate Appearance Cues in Low-Information Elections
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
Percentage of Vote
Scaled Finishing Position
coef.
s.e.
coef.
s.e.
coef.
s.e.
coef.
s.e.
Candidate Appearance CuesAttractiveness
17.59
(8.54) *
3.26
(3.18) 46.25
(16.67) **
8.63
(22.39)
Gender
-1.49
(2.79) 1.00
(1.01)
2.22
(5.45)
7.69
(7.14)
White
13.81
(3.34) **
-0.34
(1.98) 29.23
(6.52) **
-16.41
(13.96)
Medium Skin Tone
-0.06
(4.25)
1.46
(1.22)
8.50
(8.30)
1.27
(8.60)
Headwear
-9.33
(9.17)
0.66
(1.13) -9.96
(17.89)
-5.24
(7.99)
Age
6.20
(4.52)
2.88
(2.14)
-1.55
(8.82)
20.72
(15.07)
No Photograph
1.89
(5.99)
-0.07
(2.12)
-18.54
(11.69)
-42.53
(14.91) **
Quality
1.47
(1.52)
0.70
(0.89)
2.49
(2.96)
-4.29
(6.26)
Ballot Position
-0.26
(0.35)
-0.03
(0.05)
-0.42
(0.68)
-0.63
(0.32) *
STV
-28.58
(3.46) **
-50.27
(2.44) **
0.39
(6.76)
-32.76
(17.20) *
Number of Candidates
-0.38
(0.33)
-0.10
(0.05) **
1.29
(0.64) *
0.67
(0.35)
Constant
28.93
(7.41) **
53.70
(3.77) **
2.75
(14.46)
66.03
(26.56) **
135
75
135
83
Adj. Rsq
0.56
0.97
0.21
0.24
n=212*p < .05 (one tailed) **p < .025 (one tailed)
Polling Place
Postal Vote
Table 5: Postal Voting Effects on Candidate Appearance and Ballot Position Cues
Postal Vote
Polling Place
|
| | Authors: Banducci, Susan., Thrasher, Michael., Rallings, Colin. and Karp, Jeffrey. |
|
| |
|
|
Percentage of Vote
Scaled Finishing Position
coef.
s.e.
coef.
s.e.
coef.
s.e.
coef.
s.e.
Candidate Appearance Cues
Attractiveness
17.59
(8.54) *
3.26
(3.18) 46.25
(16.67) **
8.63
(22.39)
Gender
-1.49
(2.79) 1.00
(1.01)
2.22
(5.45)
7.69
(7.14)
White
13.81
(3.34) **
-0.34
(1.98) 29.23
(6.52) **
-16.41
(13.96)
Medium Skin Tone
-0.06
(4.25)
1.46
(1.22)
8.50
(8.30)
1.27
(8.60)
Headwear
-9.33
(9.17)
0.66
(1.13) -9.96
(17.89)
-5.24
(7.99)
Age
6.20
(4.52)
2.88
(2.14)
-1.55
(8.82)
20.72
(15.07)
No Photograph
1.89
(5.99)
-0.07
(2.12)
-18.54
(11.69)
-42.53
(14.91) **
Quality
1.47
(1.52)
0.70
(0.89)
2.49
(2.96)
-4.29
(6.26)
Ballot Position
-0.26
(0.35)
-0.03
(0.05)
-0.42
(0.68)
-0.63
(0.32) *
STV
-28.58
(3.46) **
-50.27
(2.44) **
0.39
(6.76)
-32.76
(17.20) *
Number of Candidates
-0.38
(0.33)
-0.10
(0.05) **
1.29
(0.64) *
0.67
(0.35)
Constant
28.93
(7.41) **
53.70
(3.77) **
2.75
(14.46)
66.03
(26.56) **
135
75
135
83
Adj. Rsq
0.56
0.97
0.21
0.24
n=212
*p < .05 (one tailed) **p < .025 (one tailed)
Polling Place
Postal Vote
Table 5: Postal Voting Effects on Candidate Appearance and Ballot Position Cues
Postal Vote
Polling Place
|
|
 Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
