All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Candidate Appearance Cues in Low-Information Elections
Unformatted Document Text:  8 these heuristics and produce differences in which candidates enjoy an advantage., the lengthier the ballot and if they must make their decisions in the confines of a voting booth (polling place elections) rather than at home (mail in ballots). Generally, we do not have any measure of the cognitive sophistication of voters that participated in the elections we are analyzing. Therefore, we can not test whether the use of heuristics varies by an individual’s level of sophistication but we can examine how the use of heuristics varies by the cognitive demands made on by the context of the election. The time in which voters have to make a decision may influence the use of heuristics. Decisions are more likely to reflect the use of shortcuts when time is limited. Therefore, we expect that elections held in the polling place will show more evidence of heuristic use than will elections where voters return ballots by post and are able to acquire and process more information when making a decision. Voters face greater cognitive complexity under rules where they must rank preferences for all candidates (STV) rather than choose a number of candidates from a list in multi- member plurality elections (MMP) (see Farrell). Cognitively, the task of ranking candidates is more analogous to making comparisons across all candidates while selecting a number of candidates from a list is less cognitively demanding in that it does not require explicit comparisons or rankings. Likewise we might expect differences in ballot position effects and the use of candidate appearance cues across the types of elections. While we might expect shortcuts to be related to outcomes, because the context seems to condition which cues are used, ballot position may be a more appropriate shortcut in the absence of other information about the candidate or in situations where the cognitive task is complex. H 1 : Candidates with a more favorable appearance (more attractive, men, and white) will be advantaged. H 2 : Candidates will be advantaged by better ballot placement. H 3 : These advantages will be more prominent under STV than MMP rules.

Authors: Banducci, Susan., Thrasher, Michael., Rallings, Colin. and Karp, Jeffrey.
first   previous   Page 9 of 25   next   last



background image
8
these heuristics and produce differences in which candidates enjoy an advantage., the
lengthier the ballot and if they must make their decisions in the confines of a voting booth
(polling place elections) rather than at home (mail in ballots).
Generally, we do not have any measure of the cognitive sophistication of voters that
participated in the elections we are analyzing. Therefore, we can not test whether the use
of heuristics varies by an individual’s level of sophistication but we can examine how the
use of heuristics varies by the cognitive demands made on by the context of the election.
The time in which voters have to make a decision may influence the use of heuristics.
Decisions are more likely to reflect the use of shortcuts when time is limited. Therefore,
we expect that elections held in the polling place will show more evidence of heuristic
use than will elections where voters return ballots by post and are able to acquire and
process more information when making a decision.
Voters face greater cognitive complexity under rules where they must rank preferences
for all candidates (STV) rather than choose a number of candidates from a list in multi-
member plurality elections (MMP) (see Farrell). Cognitively, the task of ranking
candidates is more analogous to making comparisons across all candidates while
selecting a number of candidates from a list is less cognitively demanding in that it does
not require explicit comparisons or rankings.
Likewise we might expect differences in ballot position effects and the use of candidate
appearance cues across the types of elections. While we might expect shortcuts to be
related to outcomes, because the context seems to condition which cues are used, ballot
position may be a more appropriate shortcut in the absence of other information about the
candidate or in situations where the cognitive task is complex.
H
1
: Candidates with a more favorable appearance (more attractive, men, and white) will
be advantaged.
H
2
: Candidates will be advantaged by better ballot placement.
H
3
: These advantages will be more prominent under STV than MMP rules.


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 9 of 25   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.