All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Kramer Versus Kramer: The Impact of Aggregate Economic Conditions on Individual Votes
Unformatted Document Text:  38 Appendix This section details the presidential election forecast procedure and its relation to the impact of partisan shocks. In order to impute an election prediction I use a slightly modified quarterly version of Fair’s (1998) election forecast model: Vote = b 0 + b 1 Inc + b 2 GDP PER CAPITA *Inc + b 3 GDP DEFLATOR *Inc + b 4 n*Inc + b 5 IncRun + b 6 IncDur + b 7 Trialheat, (A1) where Vote is the Democratic share of the two-party presidential vote; Inc is 1 if there is a Democratic incumbent at the time of the election and -1 if there is a Republican incumbent; IncRun is 1 if a Democratic incumbent is running for election, -1 if a Republican incumbent is running for election, and 0 otherwise; IncDur is 0 if the incumbent party has been in power for one term, 1 for Democrats and -1 for Republicans if the incumbent party has been in power for two consecutive terms, 1.25 for Democrats and -1.25 for Republicans if the incumbent party has been in power for three consecutive terms, 1.50 and -1.50 for four consecutive terms, and so forth; GDP PER CAPITA represents the growth rate of real per capita GDP during the three quarters prior to the current quarter (t-3); GDP DEFLATOR is the absolute value of the annual growth rate of the GDP deflator in the prior quarters of the administration (GDP data are from the Bureau of Economic Analysis); n is the number of quarters during the current administration in which the growth rate of real per capita GDP is greater than 3.2 percent at an annual rate; and Trialheat is the Democrat’s trial-heat result which is entered for the 15 th and 16 th quarters of the election cycle, that is, the two quarters immediately prior to the election. Gallup trial heat data collected prior to September of the election year have not proven to be of serious value in election prediction efforts (Campbell and Garand 2000).

Authors: Grafstein, Robert.
first   previous   Page 39 of 51   next   last



background image
38
Appendix
This section details the presidential election forecast procedure and its relation to the
impact of partisan shocks. In order to impute an election prediction I use a slightly modified
quarterly version of Fair’s (1998) election forecast model:
Vote = b
0
+ b
1
Inc + b
2
GDP
PER CAPITA
*Inc + b
3
GDP
DEFLATOR
*Inc + b
4
n*Inc
+ b
5
IncRun + b
6
IncDur + b
7
Trialheat,
(A1)
where Vote is the Democratic share of the two-party presidential vote; Inc is 1 if there is a
Democratic incumbent at the time of the election and -1 if there is a Republican incumbent;
IncRun
is 1 if a Democratic incumbent is running for election, -1 if a Republican incumbent is
running for election, and 0 otherwise; IncDur is 0 if the incumbent party has been in power for
one term, 1 for Democrats and -1 for Republicans if the incumbent party has been in power for
two consecutive terms, 1.25 for Democrats and -1.25 for Republicans if the incumbent party
has been in power for three consecutive terms, 1.50 and -1.50 for four consecutive terms, and
so forth; GDP
PER CAPITA
represents the growth rate of real per capita GDP during the three
quarters prior to the current quarter (t-3); GDP
DEFLATOR
is the absolute value of the annual
growth rate of the GDP deflator in the prior quarters of the administration (GDP data are from
the Bureau of Economic Analysis); n is the number of quarters during the current
administration in which the growth rate of real per capita GDP is greater than 3.2 percent at an
annual rate; and Trialheat is the Democrat’s trial-heat result which is entered for the 15
th
and
16
th
quarters of the election cycle, that is, the two quarters immediately prior to the election.
Gallup trial heat data collected prior to September of the election year have not proven to be of
serious value in election prediction efforts (Campbell and Garand 2000).


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 39 of 51   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.