All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Race, Labor Unions, and American Political Development in the 20th Century
Unformatted Document Text:  28 conducted by private persons whom the government does not control.” 108 Blumrosen was right about the simple threat of litigation, and in certain situations it seemed to work. The President of the Building Trades, Peter Schoemann, for example, backed off of his vocal opposition to affirmative action in 1968 because he was “persuaded…by the danger of exposing our local unions and apprenticeship programs to the so-called ‘pattern or practice of discrimination’ suits….If we want to remain free…it is absolutely imperative that we institute affirmative action programs.” 109 Numerous unions offered to settle and sign consent decrees. In an effort to avoid “massive amounts of back pay,” for instance, the United Steelworkers signed a nation-wide consent decree to avoid the “unworkable and inconsistent rules written by judges” that “threatened bankruptcy of many local unions and severe crippling of the International.” 110 More often than not, however, conciliation failed as many unions resisted affirmative action efforts or the EEOC and private plaintiff lawyers demanded extensive sums of back pay and damages. 111 The number of cases in federal courts rose dramatically, and the litigation increase put great financial stress on unions, forcing even the most resistant among them to make 108 Alfred W. Blumrosen, Black Employment and the Law (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1971), at 44; also see Skrentny, Ibid; Herbert Hill, “The Equal Employment Opportunity Acts of 1964 and 1972: A Critical Analysis of the Legislative History and Administration of the Law,” Industrial Relations Law Journal 2:1 (1977); Robert C. Lieberman, “Ideas, Institutions, and Political Order: Explaining Political Change,” American Political Science Review 96: 697 (2002). 109 Peter T. Schoemann, “United Association and Affirmative Action—Report to UA Membership from General President.” (March 27, 1968), Jewish Labor Council, “AFL-CIO Civil Rights Department, 1963-68,” Robert F. Wagner Archives, NYU. He went on: “for those who hold the other point of view, we carried the fight just about as far as we could….The building trades need a single policy in this area. We had no such policy, and the only policy that had a Chinaman’s chance of getting unanimous support…was a policy of affirmative action.” “You might think you have never seen a Negro applicant in your life, and you might be an honorable man, but this will not necessarily save your life if you become a defendant in one of those suits….if these suits continue over time, the Justice Department is bound to try all kinds of sociological legal theories, and attorneys tell me that if they try them often enough, they are going to win at least some of them.” 110 Steelworkers Civil Rights Decree, 1974, 1. 111 See Stein, Ibid, at 194 who argues that “The new regulators in OFCC and EEOC made the process more contentious than it need have been. They ignored unions that were prepared to cooperate.”

Authors: Frymer, Paul.
first   previous   Page 29 of 34   next   last



background image
28
conducted by private persons whom the government does not control.”
108
Blumrosen was right
about the simple threat of litigation, and in certain situations it seemed to work. The President of
the Building Trades, Peter Schoemann, for example, backed off of his vocal opposition to
affirmative action in 1968 because he was “persuaded…by the danger of exposing our local
unions and apprenticeship programs to the so-called ‘pattern or practice of discrimination’
suits….If we want to remain free…it is absolutely imperative that we institute affirmative action
programs.”
109
Numerous unions offered to settle and sign consent decrees. In an effort to avoid
“massive amounts of back pay,” for instance, the United Steelworkers signed a nation-wide
consent decree to avoid the “unworkable and inconsistent rules written by judges” that
“threatened bankruptcy of many local unions and severe crippling of the International.”
110
More often than not, however, conciliation failed as many unions resisted affirmative
action efforts or the EEOC and private plaintiff lawyers demanded extensive sums of back pay
and damages.
111
The number of cases in federal courts rose dramatically, and the litigation
increase put great financial stress on unions, forcing even the most resistant among them to make
108
Alfred W. Blumrosen, Black Employment and the Law (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press,
1971), at 44; also see Skrentny, Ibid; Herbert Hill, “The Equal Employment Opportunity Acts of 1964 and
1972: A Critical Analysis of the Legislative History and Administration of the Law,” Industrial Relations
Law Journal
2:1 (1977); Robert C. Lieberman, “Ideas, Institutions, and Political Order: Explaining Political
Change,” American Political Science Review 96: 697 (2002).
109
Peter T. Schoemann, “United Association and Affirmative Action—Report to UA Membership from
General President.” (March 27, 1968), Jewish Labor Council, “AFL-CIO Civil Rights Department, 1963-
68,” Robert F. Wagner Archives, NYU. He went on: “for those who hold the other point of view, we
carried the fight just about as far as we could….The building trades need a single policy in this area. We
had no such policy, and the only policy that had a Chinaman’s chance of getting unanimous support…was
a policy of affirmative action.” “You might think you have never seen a Negro applicant in your life, and
you might be an honorable man, but this will not necessarily save your life if you become a defendant in
one of those suits….if these suits continue over time, the Justice Department is bound to try all kinds of
sociological legal theories, and attorneys tell me that if they try them often enough, they are going to win at
least some of them.”
110
Steelworkers Civil Rights Decree, 1974, 1.
111
See Stein, Ibid, at 194 who argues that “The new regulators in OFCC and EEOC made the process more
contentious than it need have been. They ignored unions that were prepared to cooperate.”


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 29 of 34   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.