All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Race, History, and Racial Erasure
Unformatted Document Text:  38 APPENDIX A ANNOTATED TABLE OF CONTENTS Racial Constructions: Miscegenation and the Creation of White Supremacy in Alabama, 1865-1954 CHAPTER ONEMISCEGENATION AS A CONTESTED SITE This chapter introduces the study. It reviews briefly and critiques previous literature on racial formation and miscegenation. Alabama is an ideal site for the research because it punished miscegenation more stringently than its neighbors and its courts produced far more appellate litigation on miscegenation than the courts of any other state. The chapter explains how a study of regulating miscegenation in Alabama between the Civil War and the civil rights era can illuminate how racial ideologies emerged, were institutionalized, and transformed. It also outlines how these ideologies expressed in law contributed to the creation and development of the white supremacist state. It outlines the materials used for the study and explains why looking at appellate cases and their records enables a close focus on the interplay between the state on the one hand and social and cultural forces on the other as they worked dynamically to shape racial policies and racial categories. CHAPTER TWOCREATING A CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER: 1865-1883 This chapter considers post-war litigation over the constitutionality of Alabama’s 1865 statute rendering miscegenation a felony. This struggle set up the initial central place of miscegenation in the state-based and national postwar debates over race. The chapter discusses the significance of the Alabama Supreme Court’s invalidation of its statute on constitutional grounds in 1872, and the strategies that the attorney general and courts used to re-establish its constitutionality in the 1870s and early 1880s. The chapter explores the state’s articulated interests in the family as the fundamental unit of state and society and demonstrates how the cases decided after 1872 laid the groundwork for the constitutional order of white supremacy. CHAPTER THREEEVIDENCE, POLLUTION OF BLOOD AND BLOODLETTING: 1883-1917 This chapter considers legal battles over prosecutions for miscegenation and interracial rape between 1883 and 1917, linking these battles to the rise of a social order of white supremacy. It covers Alabama’s constitutional convention of 1901, in which the conventioneers forbade the legislature from ever allowing the legitimization of interracial marriages. The chapter places these state actions in the context of the rise of eugenic theories about race and heredity. Alabama’s courts’ rulings emphasized the need to prove that an allegedly miscegenous connection involved an ongoing agreement to continue a relationship, which refined the state’s interest in preventing the formation of interracial families. The courts also articulated rules about the content and admissibility of confessions touching the elements of miscegenation, grounding the debates to come later. CHAPTER FOURLITIGATING RACE: 1918-1928 This chapter focuses on the era when the pact popularized in Birth of a Nation was finalized: these years saw the consolidation of the agreement that the south was to have free rein over racial politics, as the Ku Klux Klan gained political influence nationally. In these years, the courts considered several appeals contesting the state’s methods for establishing race in prosecutions for miscegenation. The chapter explains how both the Alabama Supreme Court and the legislature attempted to solve the problems created by strictly hereditary definitions of race. Drawing from rulings in the previous period, the high court ruled that appearance and associations could constitute an admission of one’s

Authors: Novkov, Julie.
first   previous   Page 39 of 41   next   last



background image
38
APPENDIX A
ANNOTATED TABLE OF CONTENTS
Racial Constructions: Miscegenation and the Creation of
White Supremacy in Alabama, 1865-1954
CHAPTER ONE
MISCEGENATION AS A CONTESTED SITE
This chapter introduces the study. It reviews briefly and critiques previous literature on racial
formation and miscegenation. Alabama is an ideal site for the research because it punished
miscegenation more stringently than its neighbors and its courts produced far more appellate litigation
on miscegenation than the courts of any other state. The chapter explains how a study of regulating
miscegenation in Alabama between the Civil War and the civil rights era can illuminate how racial
ideologies emerged, were institutionalized, and transformed. It also outlines how these ideologies
expressed in law contributed to the creation and development of the white supremacist state. It
outlines the materials used for the study and explains why looking at appellate cases and their records
enables a close focus on the interplay between the state on the one hand and social and cultural forces
on the other as they worked dynamically to shape racial policies and racial categories.
CHAPTER TWO
CREATING A CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER: 1865-1883
This chapter considers post-war litigation over the constitutionality of Alabama’s 1865 statute
rendering miscegenation a felony. This struggle set up the initial central place of miscegenation in
the state-based and national postwar debates over race. The chapter discusses the significance of the
Alabama Supreme Court’s invalidation of its statute on constitutional grounds in 1872, and the
strategies that the attorney general and courts used to re-establish its constitutionality in the 1870s and
early 1880s. The chapter explores the state’s articulated interests in the family as the fundamental
unit of state and society and demonstrates how the cases decided after 1872 laid the groundwork for
the constitutional order of white supremacy.
CHAPTER THREE
EVIDENCE, POLLUTION OF BLOOD AND BLOODLETTING: 1883-1917
This chapter considers legal battles over prosecutions for miscegenation and interracial rape between
1883 and 1917, linking these battles to the rise of a social order of white supremacy. It covers
Alabama’s constitutional convention of 1901, in which the conventioneers forbade the legislature
from ever allowing the legitimization of interracial marriages. The chapter places these state actions
in the context of the rise of eugenic theories about race and heredity. Alabama’s courts’ rulings
emphasized the need to prove that an allegedly miscegenous connection involved an ongoing
agreement to continue a relationship, which refined the state’s interest in preventing the formation of
interracial families. The courts also articulated rules about the content and admissibility of
confessions touching the elements of miscegenation, grounding the debates to come later.
CHAPTER FOUR
LITIGATING RACE: 1918-1928
This chapter focuses on the era when the pact popularized in Birth of a Nation was finalized: these
years saw the consolidation of the agreement that the south was to have free rein over racial politics,
as the Ku Klux Klan gained political influence nationally. In these years, the courts considered
several appeals contesting the state’s methods for establishing race in prosecutions for miscegenation.
The chapter explains how both the Alabama Supreme Court and the legislature attempted to solve the
problems created by strictly hereditary definitions of race. Drawing from rulings in the previous
period, the high court ruled that appearance and associations could constitute an admission of one’s


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 39 of 41   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.