All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Decentralization`s Non-democratic Roots
Unformatted Document Text:  3 officials. I explore this middle ground by investigating the subnational reforms that authoritarian governments introduced in Latin America in the second half of the 20 th century. In the cases included in my research, military-led governments at the center canceled subnational elections and then proceeded to re-engineer subnational institutions in ways that went far beyond bureaucratic deconcentration. According to the dynamic I explore in this paper, the replacement of democratically- elected subnational officials with appointed individuals from the center enabled military governments to contemplate a subsequent expansion in the roles played by subnational governments. Having asserted tight political control over subnational officials, de facto authorities at the national level no longer had cause to worry that subnational spheres of government could be used in ways that would challenge or undermine their objectives. In fact, rather than see subnational governments as obstacles, military authorities enlisted these levels of government as tools that could help them implement a variety of far-reaching economic and political goals. Given that these authorities chose to strengthen the capacities of un-elected subnational governments, rather than rely exclusively on the efforts of central government bureaucrats placed in subnational jurisdictions, neither devolution nor deconcentration successfully captures the logic of these military-led reforms. The decision by the military to do more than deconcentrate power within the central bureaucracy is not merely of academic interest; when democracy was restored at the subnational level with the withdrawal of the generals, newly elected officials were returned to subnational offices whose capacity had been extended in new directions. In the attempt to generate additional analytical leverage on the subnational dimensions of military rule, this paper integrates insights from the older literature on comparative authoritarianism with newer scholarship on decentralization. Toward this end,

Authors: Eaton, Kent.
first   previous   Page 4 of 44   next   last



background image
3
officials. I explore this middle ground by investigating the subnational reforms that
authoritarian governments introduced in Latin America in the second half of the 20
th
century. In the cases included in my research, military-led governments at the center
canceled subnational elections and then proceeded to re-engineer subnational institutions in
ways that went far beyond bureaucratic deconcentration.
According to the dynamic I explore in this paper, the replacement of democratically-
elected subnational officials with appointed individuals from the center enabled military
governments to contemplate a subsequent expansion in the roles played by subnational
governments. Having asserted tight political control over subnational officials, de facto
authorities at the national level no longer had cause to worry that subnational spheres of
government could be used in ways that would challenge or undermine their objectives. In
fact, rather than see subnational governments as obstacles, military authorities enlisted these
levels of government as tools that could help them implement a variety of far-reaching
economic and political goals. Given that these authorities chose to strengthen the capacities
of un-elected subnational governments, rather than rely exclusively on the efforts of central
government bureaucrats placed in subnational jurisdictions, neither devolution nor
deconcentration successfully captures the logic of these military-led reforms. The decision
by the military to do more than deconcentrate power within the central bureaucracy is not
merely of academic interest; when democracy was restored at the subnational level with the
withdrawal of the generals, newly elected officials were returned to subnational offices
whose capacity had been extended in new directions.
In the attempt to generate additional analytical leverage on the subnational
dimensions of military rule, this paper integrates insights from the older literature on
comparative authoritarianism with newer scholarship on decentralization. Toward this end,


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 4 of 44   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.