All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Understanding the Economic and Institutionalist Determinants of Nationalist Support
Unformatted Document Text:  I I N N T T R R O O D D U U C C T T I I O O N N This paper investigates the conditions under which nationalist political parties in Eastern and Western Europe are able to attract meaningful electoral support in national elections. We focus on a collection of economic, social, institutional, and historical variables drawn from existing research on nationalist parties to understand how these factors, alone and in combination, affect these parties’ propensity to win votes. In so doing, we explicitly look at explanations at the macro-social and economic level rather than individual voter choice; the reasons why particular individuals support for one party over another have generated a substantial body of research in its own right (see, among others, Whiteley 1979; Husbands 1984; Duch and Gibson 1992; Lubbers and Scheepers 2002; Zoco and Messina 2002). Our aim, however, is to explore the objective political, social, and economic conditions that can inform voters’ subjective appraisals of these parties’ claims and promises and thus, drive overall electoral results. As a second order concern, we are interested in understanding if and how the dynamics of nationalist political support differ substantively as we move geographically from Western to Eastern Europe. Here, we explore whether the same kinds of variables matter for nationalist parties in the West and the East and, if so, whether these variables play the same kind of role or have the same degree of importance for countries with quite dissimilar economic conditions, political legacies, social experiences, and historical memories. Understanding why and how certain nationalist parties do well at the polls seems particularly urgent at present, given a flurry of well-publicized electoral victories by right-wing nationalist parties spanning Europe. In April 2002, the results of the first round of voting in the French presidential election stunned political observers the world over as Jean Marie Le Pen, the charismatic and controversial leader of the far-right National Front Party, received 16.86% of the vote—enough to earn himself a place on the second-round ballot and keep the socialist candidate, Prime Minister Lionel Jospin, out of the running. Despite Le Pen’s sound defeat in the second ballot two weeks later, his high profile victory in the first round touched off a wave of speculation and analysis about the re-emergence of radical right nationalist politics across Europe (see, for example, Bell and Criddle 2002; Eatwell 2002). Le Pen’s success was not easy to dismiss as an anomaly, as it followed on the heels of a string of highly publicized electoral gains by right-wing nationalist parties in Austria, Italy, Russia and Slovakia while in Belgium, Estonia, the Netherlands, Denmark and a host of other countries, right-wing parties using nationalist rhetoric and advocating exclusionary policies posted surprisingly strong results in national elections (Caramani 2000; see Ramet 1999). 1

Authors: Gupta, Devashree. and Koesel, Karrie.
first   previous   Page 2 of 41   next   last



background image
I
I
N
N
T
T
R
R
O
O
D
D
U
U
C
C
T
T
I
I
O
O
N
N
This paper investigates the conditions under which nationalist political parties in Eastern and
Western Europe are able to attract meaningful electoral support in national elections. We focus on a
collection of economic, social, institutional, and historical variables drawn from existing research on
nationalist parties to understand how these factors, alone and in combination, affect these parties’
propensity to win votes. In so doing, we explicitly look at explanations at the macro-social and
economic level rather than individual voter choice; the reasons why particular individuals support
for one party over another have generated a substantial body of research in its own right (see,
among others, Whiteley 1979; Husbands 1984; Duch and Gibson 1992; Lubbers and Scheepers
2002; Zoco and Messina 2002). Our aim, however, is to explore the objective political, social, and
economic conditions that can inform voters’ subjective appraisals of these parties’ claims and
promises and thus, drive overall electoral results. As a second order concern, we are interested in
understanding if and how the dynamics of nationalist political support differ substantively as we
move geographically from Western to Eastern Europe. Here, we explore whether the same kinds of
variables matter for nationalist parties in the West and the East and, if so, whether these variables
play the same kind of role or have the same degree of importance for countries with quite dissimilar
economic conditions, political legacies, social experiences, and historical memories.
Understanding why and how certain nationalist parties do well at the polls seems particularly
urgent at present, given a flurry of well-publicized electoral victories by right-wing nationalist parties
spanning Europe. In April 2002, the results of the first round of voting in the French presidential
election stunned political observers the world over as Jean Marie Le Pen, the charismatic and
controversial leader of the far-right National Front Party, received 16.86% of the vote—enough to
earn himself a place on the second-round ballot and keep the socialist candidate, Prime Minister
Lionel Jospin, out of the running. Despite Le Pen’s sound defeat in the second ballot two weeks
later, his high profile victory in the first round touched off a wave of speculation and analysis about
the re-emergence of radical right nationalist politics across Europe (see, for example, Bell and
Criddle 2002; Eatwell 2002). Le Pen’s success was not easy to dismiss as an anomaly, as it followed
on the heels of a string of highly publicized electoral gains by right-wing nationalist parties in
Austria, Italy, Russia and Slovakia while in Belgium, Estonia, the Netherlands, Denmark and a host
of other countries, right-wing parties using nationalist rhetoric and advocating exclusionary policies
posted surprisingly strong results in national elections (Caramani 2000; see Ramet 1999).
1


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 2 of 41   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.