All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Participation, Social Interaction, and the Quality of Democracy
Unformatted Document Text:  19 The last part of our social capital index to consider is the amount of interpersonal trust our interviews revealed. It is important to point out the distinction between interpersonal or social trust, on the one hand, and trust in institutions or political trust, on the other. Sometimes the two are confused conceptually, but having trust in your fellow citizens does not necessarily mean you have trust in the political institutions; or vice versa. Several studies in OECD countries have shown that there often are strong correlations between trust in people and trust in government or political institutions. 20 There are heated debates whether the first causes the second (e.g. Putnam 2000) or the second causes the first (e.g. Rothstein & Kumlin 2001). But our data indicate that the connection between interpersonal trust and government performance (in India) may not be particularly strong at all. I have shown elsewhere (Blomkvist 2001) that OLS regression show there is a negative relation between people’s trust and (their evaluation of) government performance. What role does education play in this? Looking at the whole sample of 3,200 respondents there is a statistically significant effect of level of education on political participation. 21 But if we look at this relationship for each state another and very interesting picture emerges. The effect of the individual’s education on his/her political participation disappears in Kerala and West Bengal and even becomes a negative factor in Gujarat. Given the conventional wisdom that education always and everywhere affects political engagement and attitudes, and the central role (primary) education often is given in aid and discussions about development this result is astonishing. Are we simply wrong? Or can these data be interpreted in a light that make them more comprehensible? If we sharpen our lens and make the picture more nuanced by looking at the separate caste groups for the whole sample and the respective states we find what is reported in tables 17 and 18. 20 In our data the picture is much more varied, depending on what kind of interpersonal trust we talk about. 21 OLS regression, controlling for the individual’s economic standard, trust in Indians, participation in associations, support network, bridging network, and discussion network.

Authors: Blomkvist, Hans.
first   previous   Page 19 of 29   next   last



background image
19
The last part of our social capital index to consider is the amount of
interpersonal trust our interviews revealed. It is important to point out the
distinction between interpersonal or social trust, on the one hand, and
trust in institutions or political trust, on the other. Sometimes the two are
confused conceptually, but having trust in your fellow citizens does not
necessarily mean you have trust in the political institutions; or vice versa.
Several studies in OECD countries have shown that there often are strong
correlations between trust in people and trust in government or political
institutions.
20
There are heated debates whether the first causes the second
(e.g. Putnam 2000) or the second causes the first (e.g. Rothstein &
Kumlin 2001). But our data indicate that the connection between
interpersonal trust and government performance (in India) may not be
particularly strong at all. I have shown elsewhere (Blomkvist 2001) that
OLS regression show there is a negative relation between people’s trust
and (their evaluation of) government performance.
What role does education play in this? Looking at the whole sample of
3,200 respondents there is a statistically significant effect of level of
education on political participation.
21
But if we look at this relationship
for each state another and very interesting picture emerges. The effect of
the individual’s education on his/her political participation disappears in
Kerala and West Bengal and even becomes a negative factor in Gujarat.
Given the conventional wisdom that education always and everywhere
affects political engagement and attitudes, and the central role (primary)
education often is given in aid and discussions about development this
result is astonishing. Are we simply wrong? Or can these data be
interpreted in a light that make them more comprehensible?
If we sharpen our lens and make the picture more nuanced by looking at
the separate caste groups for the whole sample and the respective states
we find what is reported in tables 17 and 18.
20
In our data the picture is much more varied, depending on what kind of interpersonal trust we talk
about.
21
OLS regression, controlling for the individual’s economic standard, trust in Indians, participation in
associations, support network, bridging network, and discussion network.


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 19 of 29   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.