All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Taxation and Inequality: Redistribution in the OECD
Unformatted Document Text:  2 It is well known that wage inequality has increased dramatically in the United States over the last three decades. From 1973 to 1998, the hourly earnings of a full-time worker in the 90th percentile of the American earnings distribution (someone whose earnings exceeded those of 90 per cent of all workers) relative to a worker in the tenth percentile grew by 25 per cent, and the corresponding figure for men only was nearly 40 per cent. Wage inequality has increased in most OECD countries, but the extent of this phenomenon varies a great deal, and cross-national differences in levels of wage inequality remain as great as they were in the 1970s. In the US, the worker in the 90th percentile earned 4.63 times as much as the worker in the tenth percentile in 1996. At the other end of the cross-national spectrum, the 90-10 ratio for Sweden was only 2.27. While political commentators in Europe and the US alike frequently invoke inegalitarian labor market trends to explain various manifestations of working-class political disaffection (not only support for right-wing populist parties, but also falling turnout among working-class voters), recent work by labor economists demonstrates that supply and demand factors alone cannot account for cross-national variation in wage inequality. 1 Wage inequality appears to have political determinants as well as political consequences. On both counts, it deserves to be a central concern of comparative political economy as conceived and practiced by political scientists. I use a new data set published by the OECD to engage in a pooled cross-section time-series analysis of the determinants of wage inequality in sixteen OECD countries for the period 1973-1995. In the following pages, I will first present a description of the outcomes that I am trying to explain. This brief analysis of the patterns of wage inequality in the OECD will 1 E.g., Richard Freeman and Lawrence Katz (eds.), Differences and Changes in Wage Structures (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995), 1-24; Francine Blau and Lawrence Kahn, “International Differences in Male Wage Inequality,” Journal of Political Economy, 104 (1996), 791-836; and Peter Gottschalk and Timothy Smeeding, “Cross-national Comparisons of Earnings and Income Inequality,” Journal of Economic Literature, 35 (1997), 633-87.

Authors: Rueda, David.
first   previous   Page 3 of 48   next   last



background image
2
It is well known that wage inequality has increased dramatically in the United States
over the last three decades. From 1973 to 1998, the hourly earnings of a full-time worker in
the 90th percentile of the American earnings distribution (someone whose earnings exceeded
those of 90 per cent of all workers) relative to a worker in the tenth percentile grew by 25 per
cent, and the corresponding figure for men only was nearly 40 per cent. Wage inequality has
increased in most OECD countries, but the extent of this phenomenon varies a great deal, and
cross-national differences in levels of wage inequality remain as great as they were in the
1970s. In the US, the worker in the 90th percentile earned 4.63 times as much as the worker
in the tenth percentile in 1996. At the other end of the cross-national spectrum, the 90-10
ratio for Sweden was only 2.27.
While political commentators in Europe and the US alike frequently invoke
inegalitarian labor market trends to explain various manifestations of working-class political
disaffection (not only support for right-wing populist parties, but also falling turnout among
working-class voters), recent work by labor economists demonstrates that supply and demand
factors alone cannot account for cross-national variation in wage inequality.
1
Wage
inequality appears to have political determinants as well as political consequences. On both
counts, it deserves to be a central concern of comparative political economy as conceived and
practiced by political scientists. I use a new data set published by the OECD to engage in a
pooled cross-section time-series analysis of the determinants of wage inequality in sixteen
OECD countries for the period 1973-1995.
In the following pages, I will first present a description of the outcomes that I am
trying to explain. This brief analysis of the patterns of wage inequality in the OECD will
1
E.g., Richard Freeman and Lawrence Katz (eds.), Differences and Changes in Wage
Structures (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995), 1-24; Francine Blau and
Lawrence Kahn, “International Differences in Male Wage Inequality,” Journal of
Political Economy
, 104 (1996), 791-836; and Peter Gottschalk and Timothy Smeeding,
“Cross-national Comparisons of Earnings and Income Inequality,” Journal of Economic
Literature
, 35 (1997), 633-87.


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 3 of 48   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.