All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Electoral Control in New Democracies: Fluid Party Systems as Perverse Incentives
Unformatted Document Text:  to generate information about incentives faced by individual legislators. In other words, studies of economic voting tell us how voters respond to different economic outcomes, while we investigate whether different economic outcomes impinge on the welfare of individual legislators. Notice that by shifting the emphasis away from voters and towards legislative incumbents, we can study repeated elections as a system of incentives that is designed to align the interest of individual legislators with the interest of the electorate. This step is important because it makes it possible to explicitly analyze how the incentives generated by repeated elections, i.e. by the prospect of electoral sanction, interact with the incentives generated by fluid party systems, i.e. by the prospect of switching parties. As a result, by focussing on individual incumbents, we can use our data to shed light on one of the core problems in the study of representative government: the impact of party systems on electoral accountability. The second reason for studying electoral control with incumbent-level data concerns the measurement of accountability in new democracies. Notice that measures of accountability based on party vote-shares in effect presume that electoral control works through political parties. While this assumption is perfectly reasonable in mature democracies, in the case of fluid party systems it is important to explicitly test its plausibility because, as discussed above, fluid party systems may dilute the informational value of party labels. Moreover, when party systems are fluid, measures based on party vote-shares, may either underestimate or overestimate the extent of electoral control. On one hand, if electoral control bypasses political parties, then party vote-shares will be unrelated to policy performance. Based on such a finding, we might underestimate the degree of accountability by concluding that elections do not function as a mechanism of electoral control, when in fact they do but not through political parties. On the other hand, if electoral control works through political parties, then party vote shares may be strongly related to policy performance. However, if legislative incumbents switch parties in order to escape accountability, then we might 8

Authors: Zielinski, Jakub.
first   previous   Page 9 of 29   next   last



background image
to generate information about incentives faced by individual legislators. In other words,
studies of economic voting tell us how voters respond to different economic outcomes, while
we investigate whether different economic outcomes impinge on the welfare of individual
legislators. Notice that by shifting the emphasis away from voters and towards legislative
incumbents, we can study repeated elections as a system of incentives that is designed to
align the interest of individual legislators with the interest of the electorate. This step is
important because it makes it possible to explicitly analyze how the incentives generated
by repeated elections, i.e. by the prospect of electoral sanction, interact with the incentives
generated by fluid party systems, i.e. by the prospect of switching parties. As a result, by
focussing on individual incumbents, we can use our data to shed light on one of the core
problems in the study of representative government: the impact of party systems on electoral
accountability.
The second reason for studying electoral control with incumbent-level data concerns the
measurement of accountability in new democracies. Notice that measures of accountability
based on party vote-shares in effect presume that electoral control works through political
parties. While this assumption is perfectly reasonable in mature democracies, in the case
of fluid party systems it is important to explicitly test its plausibility because, as discussed
above, fluid party systems may dilute the informational value of party labels. Moreover,
when party systems are fluid, measures based on party vote-shares, may either underestimate
or overestimate the extent of electoral control. On one hand, if electoral control bypasses
political parties, then party vote-shares will be unrelated to policy performance. Based
on such a finding, we might underestimate the degree of accountability by concluding that
elections do not function as a mechanism of electoral control, when in fact they do but not
through political parties. On the other hand, if electoral control works through political
parties, then party vote shares may be strongly related to policy performance. However,
if legislative incumbents switch parties in order to escape accountability, then we might
8


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 9 of 29   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.