All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Managing War and Election Campaigns: The Vietnam War and Election Politics
Unformatted Document Text:  18 On the other hand, Haldeman’s notes of a meeting that afternoon noted “Vietnam crisis deal – go for win – all lost otherwise – including election. US is not going to lose – cave in to communists” (H.R. Haldeman Notes, April 10, 1972). Nixon’s actual statements capture the same sentiment using a phrase about going down the “tube” that he would use throughout the crisis. Nixon reasoned to Haldeman that if Saigon collapsed, which he didn’t think likely, he would have to cancel the Russian summit since he could not go there in a weak bargaining position. “From a political standpoint, putting everything on the line, we could be right down the tube …The important thing here is that we’ve got to put all the chips in the pot and try to win it. If we win it, then everything is fine. If we lose it, frankly it would put us down the tube but that is the way the game has always been anyway.” Beyond his own political fortunes, Nixon saw South Vietnam’s collapse as threatening the entire foundation of American foreign policy. Nixon concluded they needed to take risks because “If we lose here, this office is not going to be worth a goddamn to whoever is stuck in it because the United States will no longer have any credibility on foreign policy. And that is the god’s truth….That is what these goddamned doves don’t understand. It’s over” (Conversation 705-15, April 10, 1972, NWHT). Interestingly, Nixon told his subordinates that he did not wish to have information about the current political environment at the same time he indicated that maybe they should take advantage of the current permissive attitudes. Nixon told Haldeman to cut off political information to him and not bother him with domestic politics. Since he had so much riding on Vietnam, he told Haldeman “I don’t give a crap” about polls, trial heats, and other “bullshit.” “I have to keep my mind absolutely clear, and unfettered for what could be critical decisions.” With not a hint of drama in his voice, Nixon wanted Haldeman to tell the staff, “Now for the next three weeks, the decisions that are made are going to decide the whole damned future of this country.” While he felt he would be criticized, the main thing Nixon needed to focus on was winning. Cutting off the flow of political information had an additional political benefit. Nixon concluded, “The main thing is now, don’t go around polling now. I don’t want you to poll. . . . I

Authors: Foyle, Douglas.
first   previous   Page 19 of 60   next   last



background image
18
On the other hand, Haldeman’s notes of a meeting that afternoon noted “Vietnam crisis deal – go
for win – all lost otherwise – including election. US is not going to lose – cave in to communists” (H.R.
Haldeman Notes, April 10, 1972). Nixon’s actual statements capture the same sentiment using a phrase
about going down the “tube” that he would use throughout the crisis. Nixon reasoned to Haldeman that if
Saigon collapsed, which he didn’t think likely, he would have to cancel the Russian summit since he
could not go there in a weak bargaining position. “From a political standpoint, putting everything on the
line, we could be right down the tube …The important thing here is that we’ve got to put all the chips in
the pot and try to win it. If we win it, then everything is fine. If we lose it, frankly it would put us down
the tube but that is the way the game has always been anyway.” Beyond his own political fortunes, Nixon
saw South Vietnam’s collapse as threatening the entire foundation of American foreign policy. Nixon
concluded they needed to take risks because “If we lose here, this office is not going to be worth a
goddamn to whoever is stuck in it because the United States will no longer have any credibility on foreign
policy. And that is the god’s truth….That is what these goddamned doves don’t understand. It’s over”
(Conversation 705-15, April 10, 1972, NWHT).
Interestingly, Nixon told his subordinates that he did not wish to have information about
the current political environment at the same time he indicated that maybe they should take
advantage of the current permissive attitudes. Nixon told Haldeman to cut off political
information to him and not bother him with domestic politics. Since he had so much riding on
Vietnam, he told Haldeman “I don’t give a crap” about polls, trial heats, and other “bullshit.” “I
have to keep my mind absolutely clear, and unfettered for what could be critical decisions.”
With not a hint of drama in his voice, Nixon wanted Haldeman to tell the staff, “Now for the
next three weeks, the decisions that are made are going to decide the whole damned future of this
country.” While he felt he would be criticized, the main thing Nixon needed to focus on was
winning. Cutting off the flow of political information had an additional political benefit. Nixon
concluded, “The main thing is now, don’t go around polling now. I don’t want you to poll. . . . I


Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 19 of 60   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.