|
|
|
|
Selection Bias and Continuous-Time Duration Models |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
In this paper we explore the consequences of non-random sample selection for continuous time duration analysis. While the consequences of selectivity are reasonably well-understood in linear regression and common discrete choice models, we have little or no understanding of how selectivity affects duration models. We study this issue by conducting a series of Monte Carlo analyses that estimate common duration models on data that suffer from selectivity. Our findings indicate that the consequences are severe: both coefficients and standard errors may be biased in an unknown direction. In addition, we find that selection bias may create the appearance of (non-existent) duration dependence. Given these difficulties, we develop a solution for self-selectivity bias in duration models and apply this solution to a prominent study of war participation and political leadership tenure. Based on empirical analysis and Monte Carlo simulations, our solution for selectivity bias in duration models is superior to models that ignore the problem. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
model (192), durat (119), select (118), estim (110), 1 (74), war (64), exponenti (62), correl (55), bias (53), standard (49), error (45), distribut (44), process (43), use (42), observ (39), data (38), polit (37), depend (37), variabl (36), state (35), analysi (35), |
|
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Boehmke, Frederick., Morey, Daniel. and Shannon, Megan. "Selection Bias and Continuous-Time Duration Models" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia Marriott Hotel, Philadelphia, PA, Aug 27, 2003 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p64619_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Boehmke, F. , Morey, D. S. and Shannon, M. , 2003-08-27 "Selection Bias and Continuous-Time Duration Models" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia Marriott Hotel, Philadelphia, PA Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p64619_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: In this paper we explore the consequences of non-random sample selection for continuous time duration analysis. While the consequences of selectivity are reasonably well-understood in linear regression and common discrete choice models, we have little or no understanding of how selectivity affects duration models. We study this issue by conducting a series of Monte Carlo analyses that estimate common duration models on data that suffer from selectivity. Our findings indicate that the consequences are severe: both coefficients and standard errors may be biased in an unknown direction. In addition, we find that selection bias may create the appearance of (non-existent) duration dependence. Given these difficulties, we develop a solution for self-selectivity bias in duration models and apply this solution to a prominent study of war participation and political leadership tenure. Based on empirical analysis and Monte Carlo simulations, our solution for selectivity bias in duration models is superior to models that ignore the problem. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.PDF |
| Page count: |
39 |
| Word count: |
9020 |
| Text sample: |
| Selection Bias and Continuous-Time Duration Models: Consequences and a Proposed Solution Frederick J. Boehmke Daniel Morey Megan Shannon University of Iowa August 25 2003 Correspondence: frederick-boehmke@uiowa.edu. The authors would like to thank Scott Bennett Suzie De Boef and Chris Zorn for their helpful suggestions. All remaining errors are ours. Abstract In this paper we explore the consequences of non-random sample selection for continuous time duration analysis. While the consequences of selectivity are reasonably well-understood in linear regression and common |
| 0.52 (0.68) Western Hemisphere 0.69 (0.65) Mideast Region 0.95 (0.81) Leader Time in Office -0.003 (0.02) N 10 602 N 205 N (war) 316 Log likelihood -322.96 Log likelihood -322.96 Wald chi square 12.57 Wald chi square 12.57 * = p .10 (two-tailed) ** = p .05 (two-tailed) *** = p .001 (two-tailed) 2 |
Similar Titles:
Underestimating Selection Bias in Political Science: The Unforeseen Consequences of Algorithmic Errors in the Estimation of Heckman Selection Models
Who Votes Strategically?_x000d_A Panel Data Analysis of the 2006 Mexican Presidential Election and an Individual-Level Model that Accounts for Measurement Error in the Dependent Variable
|
|