|
|
|
|
Vote Choice and Vote Change in the Antebellum House: Evidence from the Gag Rule, 1836-1845 |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
From the 24th through the 28th Congresses, the House of Representatives operated under a self-imposed “gag rule” that blocked receipt of petitions for the abolition of slavery or the slave trade. The decade-long series of recurring House votes on the gag rule represent not only a significant and underemphasized part of the antebellum debate over slavery but also an excellent context in which to test a number of propositions about member decision making. In this paper, I analyze members’ voting records on the gag rule. I show, first, that partisanship as well as constituency and electoral considerations are related to gag rule voting. I then show that some members reversed their gag rule positions over time, and I use event history analysis to demonstrate that they did so in systematic ways; I also discuss the contributions of these position reversals and member replacement to policy change. These dynamics of gag rule politics, I argue, illustrate important dynamics within the second party system. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
gag (208), vote (207), rule (148), member (111), congress (77), hous (72), northern (66), chang (65), parti (64), posit (57), democrat (53), polit (50), southern (50), elector (49), whig (48), histori (46), time (43), slaveri (42), model (40), replac (39), issu (38), |
|
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Meinke, Scott. "Vote Choice and Vote Change in the Antebellum House: Evidence from the Gag Rule, 1836-1845" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia Marriott Hotel, Philadelphia, PA, Aug 08, 2003 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p64631_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Meinke, S. , 2003-08-08 "Vote Choice and Vote Change in the Antebellum House: Evidence from the Gag Rule, 1836-1845" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia Marriott Hotel, Philadelphia, PA Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p64631_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: From the 24th through the 28th Congresses, the House of Representatives operated under a self-imposed “gag rule” that blocked receipt of petitions for the abolition of slavery or the slave trade. The decade-long series of recurring House votes on the gag rule represent not only a significant and underemphasized part of the antebellum debate over slavery but also an excellent context in which to test a number of propositions about member decision making. In this paper, I analyze members’ voting records on the gag rule. I show, first, that partisanship as well as constituency and electoral considerations are related to gag rule voting. I then show that some members reversed their gag rule positions over time, and I use event history analysis to demonstrate that they did so in systematic ways; I also discuss the contributions of these position reversals and member replacement to policy change. These dynamics of gag rule politics, I argue, illustrate important dynamics within the second party system. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.pdf |
| Page count: |
41 |
| Word count: |
11202 |
| Text sample: |
| Vote Choice and Vote Change in the Antebellum House: Evidence from the Gag Rule 1836-1845* Scott R. Meinke Assistant Professor Department of Political Science Bucknell University Lewisburg PA 17837 smeinke@bucknell.edu http://www.facstaff.bucknell.edu/smeinke/ Prepared for delivery at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association August 28 - August 31 2003. Copyright by the American Political Science Association. Abstract: From the 24th through the 28th Congresses the House of Representatives operated under a self-imposed “gag rule” that blocked receipt |
| NtoY_28 Direction and Congress SDSD: Southern Democrat replaced by Southern Democrat SDSW: Southern Democrat replaced by Southern Whig SWSD: Southern Whig replaced by Southern Democrat SWSW: Southern Whig replaced by Southern Whig NWNW: Northern Whig replaced by Northern Whig NWND: Northern Whig replaced by Northern Democrat NDNW: Northern Democrat replaced by Northern Whig NDND: Northern Democrat replaced by Northern Democrat Note: Totals for the 27th Congress include one nay-to-yea replacement by special election during the 26th Congress and totals |
Similar Titles:
Dimensions of Political Positions: A Latent Trait Model for Electoral Platforms of Political Parties
Electoral Rules and Support for the Extreme Right: A District-Level Sample Selection Model of Voting for Extreme Right Parties in Europe, 1980-2004
|
|