|
|
|
|
German Pork? Legislators' Strategies in German Bundesrat and U.S. Congress |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
The German government needed to gain support from a majority in the Bundesrat to pass parts of the tax and retirement reform packages that were dependent on Bundesrat approval. However, the opposition parties opposed the reforms and sought to kill the bill in Bundesrat.
Since the ruling coalition and opposition parties could not agree on compromises, the government made financial offers to a few state governments ruled by coalitions to change their voting behavior and thus secure a majority in Bundesrat.
Not surprisingly, this strategy was quickly compared to U.S. style pork barreling. This article takes up this comparison and comes to the conclusion that the government used the prevalent Parteienlogik to secure passage in Bundestag. In Bundesrat, however, the federal government’s strategy of distributive politics providing pork projects to state coalition governments ran counter to the Parteienlogik. This dual strategy has serious potential of undermining two fundamental institutions in German politics – consensus-orientation of the system as a whole and objectivity (Sachorientierung) in Bundesrat. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
bundesrat (106), polit (77), state (69), parti (68), pork (66), german (60), govern (58), bill (51), interest (40), reform (39), feder (39), coalit (38), tax (36), u.s (34), major (34), deutscher (33), support (31), system (29), barrel (28), district (28), member (27), |
Author's Keywords:
|
Pork Barrel, distributive politics, Congress, Senate, Bundesrat, Germany, United States |
|
 | Convention | | Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Schaper, Marcus. "German Pork? Legislators' Strategies in German Bundesrat and U.S. Congress" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia Marriott Hotel, Philadelphia, PA, Aug 27, 2003 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p64685_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Schaper, M. , 2003-08-27 "German Pork? Legislators' Strategies in German Bundesrat and U.S. Congress" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia Marriott Hotel, Philadelphia, PA Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p64685_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: The German government needed to gain support from a majority in the Bundesrat to pass parts of the tax and retirement reform packages that were dependent on Bundesrat approval. However, the opposition parties opposed the reforms and sought to kill the bill in Bundesrat.
Since the ruling coalition and opposition parties could not agree on compromises, the government made financial offers to a few state governments ruled by coalitions to change their voting behavior and thus secure a majority in Bundesrat.
Not surprisingly, this strategy was quickly compared to U.S. style pork barreling. This article takes up this comparison and comes to the conclusion that the government used the prevalent Parteienlogik to secure passage in Bundestag. In Bundesrat, however, the federal government’s strategy of distributive politics providing pork projects to state coalition governments ran counter to the Parteienlogik. This dual strategy has serious potential of undermining two fundamental institutions in German politics – consensus-orientation of the system as a whole and objectivity (Sachorientierung) in Bundesrat. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.pdf |
| Page count: |
19 |
| Word count: |
7864 |
| Text sample: |
| German Pork Marcus Schaper Department of Government and Politics University of Maryland 3140 Tydings Hall College Park MD 20740 schaper@umd.edu Paper to be presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting August 29 2003 Philadelphia PA Abstract The German government needed to gain support from a majority in the Bundesrat to pass parts of the tax and retirement reform packages that were dependent on Bundesrat approval. However the opposition parties opposed the reforms and sought to kill the |
| Science 46 (3):506-514. Studlar D. T. and I. McAllister. 1996. Constituency Activity and Representational Roles Among Australian Legislators. Journal of Politics 58 (1):69-90. Thaysen Uwe. 1994. The Bundesrat the Länder and German Federalism German Issues; No. 13. Washington DC: American Institute for Contemporary German Studies. Tsebelis George and Jeannette Money. 1997. Bicameralism Political economy of institutions and decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Vetter Stefan. 2001. Rentenreform: Riester feilschte erfolgreich. Saarbrücker Zeitung 11 May. Williams Philip. 1985. The United States: |
Similar Titles:
Irrational Actors: Small Party Support for Single-Member District Electoral Reform in Japan and Taiwan
EU Federalism and the New Members from Central and Eastern Europe: Institutional Impact upon National Political Systems and Governance
Political and Policy Dynamics of Higher Education Governance and Finance Reform: The Shaping of the First State Postsecondary Education Voucher System
|
|