All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Taking Initiative: Proactive Management in Networks and Program Performance
Unformatted Document Text:  9 In the present case, a norm of proactive management exists when a manager initiates contact with network actors. 8 Conversely, a manager whose network contact is from (1,2) above can be thought of as instituting a managerial norm of reactivity. Suffice it to say, not all managers who initiate have higher quality networking skills. Along the same lines, not all managers who simply meet when they are asked have lower quality networking skills. The object is not to measure subjective networking quality. Instead, the objective is to explore and somehow quantify managerial norms, specifically proactivity and reactivity, in order to determine their influence on organizational performance. Modeling the Effects of Managerial Norms 9 The network management portion of public management is concerned with the use of managerial tools and strategies, which have demonstrable effects on program performance. This is the impetus behind studying managerial norms as strategic tools. Due to this fact , it is important that current scholars spend time grappling with questions of measurement and estimation unique to the field as they begin to think about modeling meaningful relationships. This study follows the advice of Gill and Meier (1999) and focuses on the relative magnitude of program effects (e.g. program success). More specifically it analyzes program performance as a function of managerial norms (proactive/reactive), program resources, and task difficulties (or constraints). In recent work, Meier and O’Toole (2001, 2003) and O’Toole and Meier (1999,2000) have modeled the influence of public management on program performance: O t = B 1 (S +M 1 ) O t-1 + B 2 X t M 2 (1/S) + e t [1] 10 8 It should not be assumed here that managers who do not initiate cannot be strategically effective. It is simply stating that managers who initiate may experience increased levels of organizational performance over those that do not initiate because proactivity reduces uncertainty and promotes collaboration, as posited earlier. 9 For a detailed explanation of the Meier /O’Toole management model, please refer to Meier and O’Toole (2001).

Authors: Goerdel, Holly.
first   previous   Page 9 of 31   next   last



background image
9
In the present case, a norm of proactive management exists when a manager initiates contact
with network actors.
8
Conversely, a manager whose network contact is from (1,2) above can be
thought of as instituting a managerial norm of reactivity. Suffice it to say, not all managers who
initiate have higher quality networking skills. Along the same lines, not all managers who simply
meet when they are asked have lower quality networking skills. The object is not to measure
subjective networking quality. Instead, the objective is to explore and somehow quantify
managerial norms, specifically proactivity and reactivity, in order to determine their influence
on organizational performance.
Modeling the Effects of Managerial Norms
9
The network management portion of public management is concerned with the use of
managerial tools and strategies, which have demonstrable effects on program performance. This
is the impetus behind studying managerial norms as strategic tools. Due to this fact , it is
important that current scholars spend time grappling with questions of measurement and
estimation unique to the field as they begin to think about modeling meaningful relationships.
This study follows the advice of Gill and Meier (1999) and focuses on the relative magnitude of
program effects (e.g. program success). More specifically it analyzes program performance as a
function of managerial norms (proactive/reactive), program resources, and task difficulties (or
constraints). In recent work, Meier and O’Toole (2001, 2003) and O’Toole and Meier
(1999,2000) have modeled the influence of public management on program performance:
O
t
= B
1
(S +M
1
) O
t-1
+ B
2
X
t
M
2
(1/S) + e
t
[1]
10
8
It should not be assumed here that managers who do not initiate cannot be strategically
effective. It is simply stating that managers who initiate may experience increased levels of
organizational performance over those that do not initiate because proactivity reduces
uncertainty and promotes collaboration, as posited earlier.
9
For a detailed explanation of the Meier /O’Toole management model, please refer to Meier and O’Toole (2001).


Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 9 of 31   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.