All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Knowledge Flows and the Use of Internet-Related Information Technologies in Public Sector Organizations: A Comparative Case Study
Unformatted Document Text:  18 However, at present a project is being implemented on the internal website which takes a similar direction, enabling government employees to put information on the website about active projects – their status, who is involved, who the contact people are, and what the timeline is. Another knowledge sharing instrument employed is that of manuals, or standard operational procedures, such as in DGP 2, where the team was initially hired for a fixed period of 2.5 years, currently exploring ways to let the knowledge accumulated in the team flow back into the government: Our goal is to [document] the entire output that is related to IT systems, be it the intranet, the partial projects, or the portal; […] to have created manuals which don’t leave any questions unanswered regarding how they originated, who bears which responsibilities, and who administrates it. So, it is our goal to take this operational knowledge back into the government. Imitation. As asserted before, digital government is a governance mode that challenges the traditional functioning of government in many ways. This is particularly evident with regard to “looking over the fence”, or monitoring and copying the practices of other agencies and governments. Of course agencies have compared themselves to other agencies before, but the Internet offers a whole new range of possibilities for replications the work of others – at least to a certain extent – because of the very nature of the World Wide Web. Replication from other agencies involves knowledge transfer rather than sharing, and is often regarded as an effective effort to avoid “reinventing the wheel”, as has been repeatedly stated by members of all projects. A member of DGP 3 gives an example: I would say a lot of [my work] is plagiarizing and relying on other people's, other agencies' websites, sometimes doing a lot of hard work and wading through their online or print publications, pulling out what it is the business needs, and presenting it in a user-friendly way. Imitation is mostly encouraged by the “imitated” agencies, especially if given credit for, since it promotes the image of the duplicated website: We certainly do communicate with agencies by email, just letting them know what our efforts are. We go out on the speaking circuit and speak to […] explain what the portal is all about […]. You know, we do agency presentations. DGPs often serve as a hub for diffusing best practices among the agencies, as stated members of all projects. For example, a member of DGP 3 said: We had to look for best practices, and then share those best practices across the enterprise. It doesn't make sense for one agency to have developed an expertise and not share that expertise across several different agencies that might have similar missions.

Authors: Scharf, Maria Christina.
first   previous   Page 19 of 44   next   last



background image
18
However, at present a project is being implemented on the internal website which takes a
similar direction, enabling government employees to put information on the website about active
projects – their status, who is involved, who the contact people are, and what the timeline is.
Another knowledge sharing instrument employed is that of manuals, or standard
operational procedures, such as in DGP 2, where the team was initially hired for a fixed period of
2.5 years, currently exploring ways to let the knowledge accumulated in the team flow back into
the government:
Our goal is to [document] the entire output that is related to IT systems, be it the intranet, the partial
projects, or the portal; […] to have created manuals which don’t leave any questions unanswered regarding
how they originated, who bears which responsibilities, and who administrates it. So, it is our goal to take
this operational knowledge back into the government.
Imitation. As asserted before, digital government is a governance mode that challenges
the traditional functioning of government in many ways. This is particularly evident with regard
to “looking over the fence”, or monitoring and copying the practices of other agencies and
governments. Of course agencies have compared themselves to other agencies before, but the
Internet offers a whole new range of possibilities for replications the work of others – at least to a
certain extent – because of the very nature of the World Wide Web. Replication from other
agencies involves knowledge transfer rather than sharing, and is often regarded as an effective
effort to avoid “reinventing the wheel”, as has been repeatedly stated by members of all projects.
A member of DGP 3 gives an example:
I would say a lot of [my work] is plagiarizing and relying on other people's, other agencies' websites,
sometimes doing a lot of hard work and wading through their online or print publications, pulling out what
it is the business needs, and presenting it in a user-friendly way.
Imitation is mostly encouraged by the “imitated” agencies, especially if given credit for,
since it promotes the image of the duplicated website:
We certainly do communicate with agencies by email, just letting them know what our efforts are. We go
out on the speaking circuit and speak to […] explain what the portal is all about […]. You know, we do
agency presentations.
DGPs often serve as a hub for diffusing best practices among the agencies, as stated
members of all projects. For example, a member of DGP 3 said:
We had to look for best practices, and then share those best practices across the enterprise. It doesn't make
sense for one agency to have developed an expertise and not share that expertise across several different
agencies that might have similar missions.


Convention
All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 19 of 44   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.