All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

A Model of Split-ticket Voting with Uncertainty
Unformatted Document Text:  [13] Fiorina, Morris. (2001) “Balancing Explanations of Divided Government.” In Controversies In Voting Behavior, eds. Richard G. Niemi and Herbert F. Weis- berg. Washington D.C.: CQ Press. [14] Garand, James C., and Marci Glascock Lichtl. (2000) “Explaining Divided Gov- ernment in the United States: Testing an Intentional Model of Split-Ticket Voting.” British Journal of Political Science 30:173-191. [15] Iannantuoni, Giovanna. (2002) “A Purely Non-cooperative Model of Divided Government.” Unpublished manuscript. University of Rochester. [16] Ingberman, Daniel, and John Villani. (1993) “An Institutional Theory of Di- vided Government and Party Polarization.” American Journal of Political Sci- ence 37(2):429-471. [17] Jacobson, Gary C. (1990) The Electoral Origins of Divided Government: Com- petition in U.S. House Elections, 1946-1988. Boulder: Westview Press. [18] Lacy, Dean, and Philip Paolino. (1998) “Downsian Voting and the Separation of Powers.” American Journal of Political Science 42(4):1180-1199 [19] Mattei, Franco, and John S. Howes. (2000) “Competing Explanations of Split- Ticket Voting in American National Elections.” American Politics Qaurterly 28(3):379-407. [20] Niemi, Richard G., and Herbert F. Weisberg. (2001) “Do Voters Prefer Divided Government?” In Controversies In Voting Behavior. eds. Richard G. Niemi and Herbert F. Weisberg. Washington D.C.: CQ Press. [21] Stanley, Harold W., and Richard G. Niemi. (1998) Vital Statistics on American Politics 1997-1998. Washington D.C.: CQ Press. 23

Authors: Kang, Insun.
first   previous   Page 23 of 23   next   last



background image
[13] Fiorina, Morris. (2001) “Balancing Explanations of Divided Government.” In
Controversies In Voting Behavior, eds. Richard G. Niemi and Herbert F. Weis-
berg. Washington D.C.: CQ Press.
[14] Garand, James C., and Marci Glascock Lichtl. (2000) “Explaining Divided Gov-
ernment in the United States: Testing an Intentional Model of Split-Ticket
Voting.” British Journal of Political Science 30:173-191.
[15] Iannantuoni, Giovanna. (2002) “A Purely Non-cooperative Model of Divided
Government.” Unpublished manuscript. University of Rochester.
[16] Ingberman, Daniel, and John Villani. (1993) “An Institutional Theory of Di-
vided Government and Party Polarization.” American Journal of Political Sci-
ence 37(2):429-471.
[17] Jacobson, Gary C. (1990) The Electoral Origins of Divided Government: Com-
petition in U.S. House Elections, 1946-1988. Boulder: Westview Press.
[18] Lacy, Dean, and Philip Paolino. (1998) “Downsian Voting and the Separation
of Powers.” American Journal of Political Science 42(4):1180-1199
[19] Mattei, Franco, and John S. Howes. (2000) “Competing Explanations of Split-
Ticket Voting in American National Elections.” American Politics Qaurterly
28(3):379-407.
[20] Niemi, Richard G., and Herbert F. Weisberg. (2001) “Do Voters Prefer Divided
Government?” In Controversies In Voting Behavior. eds. Richard G. Niemi and
Herbert F. Weisberg. Washington D.C.: CQ Press.
[21] Stanley, Harold W., and Richard G. Niemi. (1998) Vital Statistics on American
Politics 1997-1998. Washington D.C.: CQ Press.
23


Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 23 of 23   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.