|
|
|
|
THE ASPIN-BROWN COMMISSION: CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENT CONFRONT INTELLIGENCE POLICY |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
In between the two terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City, the first in 1993 and the second in 2001, the United States conducted a major inquiry into the status of its intelligence agencies and how well equipped they were to protect the nation against perils at home and abroad. This is an examination of that inquiry, carried out in 1995-96 by the Aspin-Brown Commission (named after its first chair, Les Aspin, and his successor, Harold Brown, both former secretaries of defense). The study is a continuation of the small stream of empirical research that has addressed the role of commissions established to provide information and advice to the federal government. Its purposes are to gain insight into the workings of a blue-ribbon advisory panel, as well as to shed light on a landmark in the evolution of American intelligence policy. The methodology is based on archival research, interviews, and, above all, participant observation?an eye-witness accounting of a significant political event. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
intellig (192), commiss (173), aspin (94), staff (57), cia (57), dci (53), commission (52), report (48), presid (48), would (47), brown (46), agenc (39), offic (37), p (35), new (32), meet (31), day (31), chairman (31), public (31), member (31), senat (29), |
|
|
 | Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Johnson, Loch. "THE ASPIN-BROWN COMMISSION: CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENT CONFRONT INTELLIGENCE POLICY" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Sheraton Boston & Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts, Aug 28, 2002 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p65638_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Johnson, L. K. , 2002-08-28 "THE ASPIN-BROWN COMMISSION: CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENT CONFRONT INTELLIGENCE POLICY" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Sheraton Boston & Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p65638_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: In between the two terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City, the first in 1993 and the second in 2001, the United States conducted a major inquiry into the status of its intelligence agencies and how well equipped they were to protect the nation against perils at home and abroad. This is an examination of that inquiry, carried out in 1995-96 by the Aspin-Brown Commission (named after its first chair, Les Aspin, and his successor, Harold Brown, both former secretaries of defense). The study is a continuation of the small stream of empirical research that has addressed the role of commissions established to provide information and advice to the federal government. Its purposes are to gain insight into the workings of a blue-ribbon advisory panel, as well as to shed light on a landmark in the evolution of American intelligence policy. The methodology is based on archival research, interviews, and, above all, participant observation?an eye-witness accounting of a significant political event. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.pdf |
| Page count: |
46 |
| Word count: |
13248 |
| Text sample: |
| 1 THE ASPINBROWN COMMISSION: CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENT CONFRONT INTELLIGENCE POLICY Loch K. Johnson In between the two terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City the first in 1993 and the second in 2001 the United States conducted a major inquiry into the status of its intelligence agencies and how well equipped they were to protect the nation against perils at home and abroad. This is an examination of that inquiry carried out in 199596 |
| Office (March 1 1996). 26. ``Harold Brown Reports '' National Security Law Report 18 (April 1996) p. 8. 27. ``Spy Pablum '' New York Times (March 3 1996) p. E14. 28. Tim Weiner ``Presidential Commission Recommends Shrinking Intelligence Agencies '' New York Times (March 1 1996) p. A17. 29. Prados op.cit. p. 57. 30. R. Jeffrey Smith ``The CIA '' Washington Post (December 26 1996) p. 11. 31. Abraham H. Miller and Brian Alexander ``Structural Quiescence in the Failure |
Similar Titles:
Would Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir Get a Fair Trial? Lessons from the U.S. Military Commissions at Guantánamo Bay for the International Criminal Court (ICC)
Professional Reputation and Public Prestige of the President: Bush II Over Time
When Collective Intelligence Agencies Collide: Public vs. Popular Intelligence, the Secret Sphere, and Network Antagonisms
A Longitudinal Time Series Analysis of the Foreign Affairs Issue: Agendas of the President, the Media, the Public
|
|