Citation

Lawmaking in the Modern Congress: Getting on the Legislative Agenda

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

How does an issue get on the legislative agenda? Political scientists - those studying both Congress and agenda setting - provide a variety of explanations. Though the analyses above from political scientists are insightful, and frequently theoretically and empirically interesting, no study yet has conclusively matched data with theory. Through an examination of 1015 bills over 27 congresses (80th to the 106th), from the presidential administration of Truman (1947) to Clinton (2000), this study takes on that daunting and Herculean task.
Three findings stand out. First, almost three-fifths (58.6 percent) of the items on the legislative agenda are exogenous to the legislative process; that is, presidents and Congress are directly responsible for less than half of all the issues on the legislative agenda. Second, divided government suppresses the president's role in formulating the agenda and accentuates the role of individual members of Congress. Third, congressional initiatives are less than half as likely to become law as any other agenda-causing agent.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

congress (117), legisl (114), agenda (97), issu (62), initi (58), presid (48), congression (47), govern (40), presidenti (35), th (34), polit (34), divid (28), act (27), get (27), categori (25), result (25), list (25), event (22), major (22), bill (22), polici (21),

Author's Keywords:

Keywords: Congress, Agenda Setting, President, Divided Government
Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Political Science Association
URL:
http://www.apsanet.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p65768_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Theriault, Sean. "Lawmaking in the Modern Congress: Getting on the Legislative Agenda" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Sheraton Boston & Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts, Aug 28, 2002 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p65768_index.html>

APA Citation:

Theriault, S. M. , 2002-08-28 "Lawmaking in the Modern Congress: Getting on the Legislative Agenda" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Sheraton Boston & Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p65768_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: How does an issue get on the legislative agenda? Political scientists - those studying both Congress and agenda setting - provide a variety of explanations. Though the analyses above from political scientists are insightful, and frequently theoretically and empirically interesting, no study yet has conclusively matched data with theory. Through an examination of 1015 bills over 27 congresses (80th to the 106th), from the presidential administration of Truman (1947) to Clinton (2000), this study takes on that daunting and Herculean task.
Three findings stand out. First, almost three-fifths (58.6 percent) of the items on the legislative agenda are exogenous to the legislative process; that is, presidents and Congress are directly responsible for less than half of all the issues on the legislative agenda. Second, divided government suppresses the president's role in formulating the agenda and accentuates the role of individual members of Congress. Third, congressional initiatives are less than half as likely to become law as any other agenda-causing agent.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Abstract Only All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available American Political Science Association
Associated Document Available Political Research Online

Document Type: .pdf
Page count: 27
Word count: 6774
Text sample:
Lawmaking in the Modern Congress: Getting on the Legislative Agenda Sean M. Theriault The University of Texas at Austin seant@mail.utexas.edu August 23 2002 Paper presented at the Annual Conference for the American Political Science Association Boston Massachusetts August 30 2002. Theriault 2 Lawmaking in the Modern Congress: Getting on the Legislative Agenda 1 How does an issue get on the legislative agenda? Observers of the political process would give you many different answers. Consider the impetus behind four different
PI 296.50 117.00 39.46 Scandal Event Instigator SEI 219.17 61.17 28.30 Total 1015.00 312.00 30.74 Table 2: Presidential and Congressional Initiatives in Divided and Unified Government. Divided Government Unified Government P­value for the Dif. Presidential Initiative 8.29 16.37 0.001 (21.71%) (43.02%) 0.0001 Congressional Initiative 5.23 3.33 0.045 (14.69%) (8.78%) 0.036 Table 3: Explanations for Presidential Initiatives. (A) (B) The Number of PIs The Proportion that was PI Divided Government ­9.636 * ­0.221 ** (3.83) (0.07) Democratic President ­2.856 ­0.040


Similar Titles:
The President`s Domestic Agenda, Divided Government and the Impact on the Public Agenda

Presidents Don't Own Issues: The Allocation of Presidential Policy Attention Across Presidential Policy Instruments


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.