Author's Keywords: Keywords: Supreme Court, Decision Making, Administrative Law, Chevron, Judicial Behavior, Law and Politics, Deference, Attitudinal Model	Convention All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p65934_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Kritzer, Herbert., Richards, Mark. and Smith, Joseph. "Deciding the Supreme Court's Administrative Law Cases: Does Chevron Matter?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Sheraton Boston & Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts, Aug 28, 2002 <Not Available>. 2009-05-27 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p65934_index.html>

Kritzer, H. M., Richards, M. J. and Smith, J. L. , 2002-08-28 "Deciding the Supreme Court's Administrative Law Cases: Does Chevron Matter?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Sheraton Boston & Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-27 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p65934_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: We identify Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council (1984) as a potential jurisprudential regime in the area of administrative law. A jurisprudential regime is a key precedent that establishes case factors which matter to the justices' decision making, and/or changes the way the justices evaluate case factors. In Chevron, the Court declared a new standard for the review of administrative agency decisions, so we expect that it alters the structure of influences on the justices' decisions. We also hypothesize that ideology and deference are key aspects of the justices' votes in administrative law cases. Relying on tests involving logistic regression, we find support for both of these hypotheses.

Brazilian’s Supreme Court of Justice During Cardoso’s Administration: A Political Analysis of Direct Actions of Unconstitutionality (Adin) Judged Between 1995 and 1998

Liberal Justices, Conservative Cases? Explaining the Ideological Nature of the Supreme Court's Agenda