Author's Keywords: Keywords: Rights; Voting Rights; Comparative Law; Criminal Justice; Constitutionalism	Convention All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p66525_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Ewald, Alec. "Of Constitutions, Politics, and Punishment: Criminal Disenfranchisement Law in Comparative Context" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Sheraton Boston & Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts, Aug 28, 2002 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p66525_index.html>

Ewald, A. C. , 2002-08-28 "Of Constitutions, Politics, and Punishment: Criminal Disenfranchisement Law in Comparative Context" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Sheraton Boston & Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p66525_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: At the beginning of the twenty-first century, the nations of the world display considerable diversity in their policies regarding voting by convicted criminals. This paper offers one of the most comprehensive treatments available in print of comparative criminal-disenfranchisement law, and develops preliminary hypotheses as to how to explain the variation in prisoner-voting policies. I argue that while legal variables?in particular, the constitutional protection of suffrage rights?are a crucial part of the puzzle, a country?s views of crime and punishment may be the more important predictor of whether and why it will bar convicts from voting. In some sampled countries, political culture appears to explain the state of prisoner-voting law more effectively than constitutional texts or judicial decisions.

Crime and Punishment? Latino, African-American, and Anglo Views of the Criminal Justice System

Experiencing Crime and Punishment: How Former Prisoners Understand the Criminal Justice System

The United States, the International Criminal Court, and Bilateral Immunity Agreements: Explaining the Resistance of Weak States and Consequences for American Foreign Policy