|
|
|
|
Taking Galton's Problem Seriously. Towards a Theory of Policy Diffusion |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
This article builds on the recent policy diffusion literature and attempts to overcome one of its major problems, namely the lack of a coherent theoretical framework. The literature defines policy diffusion as a process where policy choices are interdependent, and identifies several diffusion mechanisms that specify the link between the policy choices of the various actors. Since these mechanisms are grounded on different theories, theoretical accounts of diffusion have currently little internal coherence. In this article we put forward an expected-utility model of policy change that is able to subsume all diffusion mechanisms. We argue that the expected utility of a policy depends on both its effectiveness and the payoffs it yields, and we show that the various diffusion mechanisms operate by altering these two parameters. Each mechanism affects one of the two parameters, and does so in distinctive ways. To account for aggregate patterns of diffusion, we embed our model in a simple threshold model of diffusion. Given the high complexity of the process that results, strong analytical conclusions on aggregate patterns cannot be drawn without more extensive analysis that is beyond the scope of this paper, but preliminary considerations indicate that a wide range of diffusion processes may exist and that convergence is only one possible outcome. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
polici (203), diffus (96), effect (93), model (67), chang (67), payoff (52), m (50), mechan (47), n (46), actor (41), choic (41), adopt (40), util (39), decis (39), may (38), 1 (38), learn (36), process (35), polit (34), expect (33), maker (31), |
|
 | Convention | | Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: International Studies Association URL: http://www.isanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Gilardi, Fabrizio. "Taking Galton's Problem Seriously. Towards a Theory of Policy Diffusion" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Hilton Hawaiian Village, Honolulu, Hawaii, Mar 05, 2005 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p69588_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Gilardi, F. , 2005-03-05 "Taking Galton's Problem Seriously. Towards a Theory of Policy Diffusion" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Hilton Hawaiian Village, Honolulu, Hawaii Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p69588_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: This article builds on the recent policy diffusion literature and attempts to overcome one of its major problems, namely the lack of a coherent theoretical framework. The literature defines policy diffusion as a process where policy choices are interdependent, and identifies several diffusion mechanisms that specify the link between the policy choices of the various actors. Since these mechanisms are grounded on different theories, theoretical accounts of diffusion have currently little internal coherence. In this article we put forward an expected-utility model of policy change that is able to subsume all diffusion mechanisms. We argue that the expected utility of a policy depends on both its effectiveness and the payoffs it yields, and we show that the various diffusion mechanisms operate by altering these two parameters. Each mechanism affects one of the two parameters, and does so in distinctive ways. To account for aggregate patterns of diffusion, we embed our model in a simple threshold model of diffusion. Given the high complexity of the process that results, strong analytical conclusions on aggregate patterns cannot be drawn without more extensive analysis that is beyond the scope of this paper, but preliminary considerations indicate that a wide range of diffusion processes may exist and that convergence is only one possible outcome. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.pdf |
| Page count: |
32 |
| Word count: |
9669 |
| Text sample: |
| Taking "Galton's problem" seriously. Towards a theory of policy diffusion Dietmar Braun Université de Lausanne Switzerland dietmar.braun@unil.ch Fabrizio Gilardi Université de Lausanne Switzerland fabrizio.gilardi@unil.ch Paper for presentation at the 46th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association (ISA) Hawaii 1-5 March 2005 1 Abstract This article builds on the recent policy diffusion literature and attempts to overcome one of its major problems namely the lack of a coherent theoretical framework. The literature defines policy diffusion as a process where |
| choices of others create policy externalities Coercion Imposes costs on non- Pressures from powerful actors compliance: alters Uj/Ui Common norms Create shared beliefs on m and n. Common norms of action developed through interaction in networks Taken-for-grantedness Attributes extreme values to m Some policies are considered as and n natural choices Symbolic imitation Rewards compliance: Conformity to socially valued alters Uj/Ui policies is rewarding 32 |
Similar Titles:
How to model a rational choice theory of criminal action? Subjective expected utilities, norms, and interactions.
The Politics of Family Policies: Diffusion and Translation of International Models
Non-State Actors and Economic Policy Change: The Role of Non-State Actors in the Peruvian Process Of Neoliberal Economic Reform
|
|