All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

IPE and the Primitive: The Indians, the Scots, and the Economy
Unformatted Document Text:  9 register of similarities and differences. 22 On the one hand, similarities are explained via the process of migratory diffusion, by tracing “the origins of these peoples in the dark ages of antiquity.” 23 As Pagden puts it, “new and troubling peoples” can be assimilated to European understanding by treating them as descendents of Eurasian peoples of whom they had knowledge. 24 Identifiable similarities between the Amerindians and ancient peoples could be seen, then, as the product of diffusion—of social and linguistic practices moving around the globe along established migratory paths. Thus, the contemporary Huron and Iroquois reflect, in Lafitau’s text, vestiges of their origins as Lycians or Spartans. More generally, the various parallels between ancient religiosity, government, and marriage practices vindicate the picture of the Old World origins of the Americans. 25 On the other hand, differences are explained with a familiar claim about decay or degeneration. 26 Movement across time and space (and thereby away from the perfection of creation and the continuing revelation available to some peoples) produces a degeneration of religious practice, moral belief, and linguistic structures. Thus, the decayed state of the Amerindians is verified principally in relation to Christian moral and religious truths and Eurasian languages. Common origins explain the similarities between Amerindians and the ancients; the dispersal of humans across space accounts for their differences. Lafitau struggled with a second issue that profoundly shaped his text. More than simply establishing a singular creative episode, Lafitau aimed to make the case for a singular basis for 22 See Fenton and Moore, “Introduction,” p. xlvii, and Hodgen, Early Anthropology, p. 268. 23 Lafitau, Customs I, p. 25. 24 Pagden, Encounters, p. 29. 25 On the Hurons and Iroquois, see Lafitau, Customs I, pp. 67-9. The entire text is designed to draw “conjectures” based on comparisons of ancient and Indian practices. The chapter headings give a sense of the range of thecomparisons across religion, government, marriage and education, occupations of both men and women, warfare,trade, diplomacy, games, medicine, mourning and burial practices.

Authors: Inayatullah, Naeem. and Blaney, David.
first   previous   Page 9 of 44   next   last



background image
9
register of similarities and differences.
22
On the one hand, similarities are explained via the
process of migratory diffusion, by tracing “the origins of these peoples in the dark ages of
antiquity.”
23
As Pagden puts it, “new and troubling peoples” can be assimilated to European
understanding by treating them as descendents of Eurasian peoples of whom they had
knowledge.
24
Identifiable similarities between the Amerindians and ancient peoples could be
seen, then, as the product of diffusion—of social and linguistic practices moving around the
globe along established migratory paths. Thus, the contemporary Huron and Iroquois reflect, in
Lafitau’s text, vestiges of their origins as Lycians or Spartans. More generally, the various
parallels between ancient religiosity, government, and marriage practices vindicate the picture of
the Old World origins of the Americans.
25
On the other hand, differences are explained with a
familiar claim about decay or degeneration.
26
Movement across time and space (and thereby
away from the perfection of creation and the continuing revelation available to some peoples)
produces a degeneration of religious practice, moral belief, and linguistic structures. Thus, the
decayed state of the Amerindians is verified principally in relation to Christian moral and
religious truths and Eurasian languages. Common origins explain the similarities between
Amerindians and the ancients; the dispersal of humans across space accounts for their
differences.
Lafitau struggled with a second issue that profoundly shaped his text. More than simply
establishing a singular creative episode, Lafitau aimed to make the case for a singular basis for
22
See Fenton and Moore, “Introduction,” p. xlvii, and Hodgen, Early Anthropology, p. 268.
23
Lafitau, Customs I, p. 25.
24
Pagden, Encounters, p. 29.
25
On the Hurons and Iroquois, see Lafitau, Customs I, pp. 67-9. The entire text is designed to draw “conjectures”
based on comparisons of ancient and Indian practices. The chapter headings give a sense of the range of the
comparisons across religion, government, marriage and education, occupations of both men and women, warfare,
trade, diplomacy, games, medicine, mourning and burial practices.


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 9 of 44   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.