Citation

Saving Kant from Democratic Peace Theorists

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

In this paper I argue that Immanuel Kant’s argument in “Perpetual Peace” is a useful theory for international relations and foreign policy. Despite the usefulness of his argument, I also argue that IR scholars have misread Kant’s argument and, subsequently, so have those who have tried to apply his theory to foreign policy. There are two sources of this problem. The first is based on a lack of a clear reading of all that Kant argues in “Perpetual Peace”. Most scholars have taken part of his argument and relied on that part alone; Kant’s argument, however, is holistic and cannot be taken in parts. The second source of this problem is with those scholars who have tried to take Kant’s theory (and any political theory for that matter) as explaining a world guided by law-like regularities. To argue against this, I use Alasdair MacIntyre‘s description of the early, renaissance, political philosopher who is often credited with first applying scientific realism to politics, Niccolo Machiavelli. Because of this argument, I am not only attempting to save Kant from liberal idealists, I want to save Machiavelli from scientific realists while undercutting scientific realism itself.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

kant (162), peac (132), state (117), war (74), perpetu (57), republican (53), democrat (52), liber (51), democraci (49), one (47), theori (46), polit (41), right (40), intern (36), republ (35), human (34), discuss (33), argument (32), make (30), feder (29), articl (29),

Author's Keywords:

Liberalism, Kant, Democratic Peace Theory, Machiavelli, Scientific Realism
Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: International Studies Association
URL:
http://www.isanet.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p69698_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Schuster, Matthew. "Saving Kant from Democratic Peace Theorists" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Hilton Hawaiian Village, Honolulu, Hawaii, Mar 05, 2005 <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p69698_index.html>

APA Citation:

Schuster, M. , 2005-03-05 "Saving Kant from Democratic Peace Theorists" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Hilton Hawaiian Village, Honolulu, Hawaii Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-25 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p69698_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: In this paper I argue that Immanuel Kant’s argument in “Perpetual Peace” is a useful theory for international relations and foreign policy. Despite the usefulness of his argument, I also argue that IR scholars have misread Kant’s argument and, subsequently, so have those who have tried to apply his theory to foreign policy. There are two sources of this problem. The first is based on a lack of a clear reading of all that Kant argues in “Perpetual Peace”. Most scholars have taken part of his argument and relied on that part alone; Kant’s argument, however, is holistic and cannot be taken in parts. The second source of this problem is with those scholars who have tried to take Kant’s theory (and any political theory for that matter) as explaining a world guided by law-like regularities. To argue against this, I use Alasdair MacIntyre‘s description of the early, renaissance, political philosopher who is often credited with first applying scientific realism to politics, Niccolo Machiavelli. Because of this argument, I am not only attempting to save Kant from liberal idealists, I want to save Machiavelli from scientific realists while undercutting scientific realism itself.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Abstract Only All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available Political Research Online
Associated Document Available International Studies Association

Document Type: .PDF
Page count: 29
Word count: 8696
Text sample:
Saving Kant from the Democratic Peace Theorists Matthew Schuster Arizona State University In this paper I argue that Immanuel Kant's argument in "Perpetual Peace" is a useful theory for international relations global politics and foreign policy. Despite the usefulness of his argument I also argue that IR scholars have misread Kant's argument and subsequently so have those who have tried to apply his theory to foreign policy. There are two sources of this problem. The first is based on
1992. Domestic Structure and Preventive War: Are Democracies More Pacific? World Politics. 44: 235-269. 27 Shaw Martin. 2001. Democracy and Peace in the Global Revolution. In Tarak Barkawi and Mark Laffey eds. Liberalism Democracy and War. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers. pp. 173-194. Smith Adam. 1776. Wealth of Nations. Stoll Richard J. 1984. The Guns of November. Journal of Conflict Revolution. 28: 231-246. Waltz Kenneth. 1962. Kant Liberalism and War. American Political Science Review. 56: 331-340. Waltz Kenneth. 1979. Theory


Similar Titles:
The Rise of Liberal Leviathan and Death of Republican Localism: How the United States has been transformed from a federal union of multiple small republics into a liberal unitary regime.

Regional Protection of Human Rights as Field of Research of Human Rights, Comparative Politics, International Law and International Organization Theory


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.