All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Has the War on Terror Undermined Global Democracy?
Unformatted Document Text:  2 Our book manuscript was completed before the horrific terrorist strikes against the United States on September 11, 2001, and was only slightly modified for publication to account for some of the immediate reactions to the attacks. Whether or not one believes the oft-repeated maxim that the 9/11 attacks “changed everything,” certainly enough has changed about the post- 9/11 world to give skeptics good reason to challenge our book’s central conclusions about the ongoing democratization of global politics. The global “war on terror” has almost certainly not reflected consensual decisions made in open and inclusive global political processes. Rather, post-9/11 security decisions have generally been made privately by states, acting in their own foreign policy interests. Since the 9/11 attacks, in fact, the US government has often reserved for itself the authority to make critical decisions about peace and security even though numerous other nation-states view them as matters for the international community. In Section I to follow, we discuss how America’s unilateral exercise of power has fomented a legitimacy crisis. Then, in Section II, we discuss why the ongoing “war on terror” cannot readily address this legitimacy crisis, even though the US government claims that its strategy aims to spread freedom, liberty and democracy. Section III discusses the potential for deliberative democracy to legitimize American foreign policy. As was our earlier work, this section is informed by the discourse ethics of Jürgen Habermas. While we are very concerned about the ongoing anti-democratic practices summarized in the second section, we are also somewhat optimistic about the role global democratic forces might play in the longer term. I. America’s Legitimacy Crisis Within a day after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) for the first time in its history invoked Article V, providing for collective defense. On September 12, the United Nations

Authors: Payne, Rodger. and Samhat, Nayef.
first   previous   Page 2 of 34   next   last



background image
2
Our book manuscript was completed before the horrific terrorist strikes against the
United States on September 11, 2001, and was only slightly modified for publication to account
for some of the immediate reactions to the attacks. Whether or not one believes the oft-repeated
maxim that the 9/11 attacks “changed everything,” certainly enough has changed about the post-
9/11 world to give skeptics good reason to challenge our book’s central conclusions about the
ongoing democratization of global politics. The global “war on terror” has almost certainly not
reflected consensual decisions made in open and inclusive global political processes. Rather,
post-9/11 security decisions have generally been made privately by states, acting in their own
foreign policy interests. Since the 9/11 attacks, in fact, the US government has often reserved for
itself the authority to make critical decisions about peace and security even though numerous
other nation-states view them as matters for the international community. In Section I to follow,
we discuss how America’s unilateral exercise of power has fomented a legitimacy crisis. Then,
in Section II, we discuss why the ongoing “war on terror” cannot readily address this legitimacy
crisis, even though the US government claims that its strategy aims to spread freedom, liberty
and democracy. Section III discusses the potential for deliberative democracy to legitimize
American foreign policy. As was our earlier work, this section is informed by the discourse
ethics of Jürgen Habermas. While we are very concerned about the ongoing anti-democratic
practices summarized in the second section, we are also somewhat optimistic about the role
global democratic forces might play in the longer term.
I. America’s Legitimacy Crisis
Within a day after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on New York and
Washington, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) for the first time in its history
invoked Article V, providing for collective defense. On September 12, the United Nations


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 2 of 34   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.