All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

NGO Activism and State Compliance with Three Anti-Corruption Treaties: The Role of Transparency International
Unformatted Document Text:  Gutterman 9 Each Party shall take such measures as may be necessary to establish that it is acriminal offence under its law for any person intentionally to offer, promise orgive any undue pecuniary or other advantage, whether directly or throughintermediaries, to a foreign public official, for that official or for a third party, inorder that the official act or refrain from acting in relation to the performance ofofficial duties, in order to obtain or retain business or other improper advantage inthe conduct of international business. 19 The precision of the Convention’s provisions is further evident through separate articles on Responsibility of Legal Persons, Sanctions, Jurisdiction, Statute of Limitations, and other measures, which establish signatories’ obligations through concrete formulations that effectively narrow the scope for reasonable interpretation. The Convention’s article on Enforcement, furthermore, explicitly states that in their investigation and prosecution of the bribery of a foreign public official, Parties “shall not be influenced by considerations of national economic interest, the potential effect upon relations with another State or the identity of the natural or legal persons involved.” 20 Delegation: Formal Follow-Up Mechanism In addition to its high levels of obligation and precision, the Convention contains a strong measure of delegation, through its inclusion of a formal peer-review mechanism to monitor and enforce compliance. Under the heading “Monitoring and Follow-up”, the Convention’s Article 12 stipulates that “the Parties shall co-operate in carrying out a programme of systematic follow-up to monitor and promote the full implementation of this Convention.” 21 Under the framework of the OECD Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions (hereafter referred to as the Working Group or the Group), the Convention’s monitoring and enforcement mechanism consists of a two-phase peer- review of the implementation steps taken by participating countries. Phase 1 monitoring evaluates whether the legal texts through which participants implement the Convention meet the required standard. The purpose of Phase 2 is to study the structures put in place to enforce the implementing laws and rules, and to assess their application in practice. 19 OECD 2000, 244. 20 OECD 2000, 245. 21 OECD 2000, 247.

Authors: Gutterman, Ellen.
first   previous   Page 9 of 26   next   last



background image
Gutterman
9
Each Party shall take such measures as may be necessary to establish that it is a
criminal offence under its law for any person intentionally to offer, promise or
give any undue pecuniary or other advantage, whether directly or through
intermediaries, to a foreign public official, for that official or for a third party, in
order that the official act or refrain from acting in relation to the performance of
official duties, in order to obtain or retain business or other improper advantage in
the conduct of international business.
19
The precision of the Convention’s provisions is further evident through separate
articles on Responsibility of Legal Persons, Sanctions, Jurisdiction, Statute of
Limitations, and other measures, which establish signatories’ obligations through
concrete formulations that effectively narrow the scope for reasonable interpretation. The
Convention’s article on Enforcement, furthermore, explicitly states that in their
investigation and prosecution of the bribery of a foreign public official, Parties “shall not
be influenced by considerations of national economic interest, the potential effect upon
relations with another State or the identity of the natural or legal persons involved.”
20
Delegation: Formal Follow-Up Mechanism
In addition to its high levels of obligation and precision, the Convention contains
a strong measure of delegation, through its inclusion of a formal peer-review mechanism
to monitor and enforce compliance. Under the heading “Monitoring and Follow-up”, the
Convention’s Article 12 stipulates that “the Parties shall co-operate in carrying out a
programme of systematic follow-up to monitor and promote the full implementation of
this Convention.”
21
Under the framework of the OECD Working Group on Bribery in International
Business Transactions (hereafter referred to as the Working Group or the Group), the
Convention’s monitoring and enforcement mechanism consists of a two-phase peer-
review of the implementation steps taken by participating countries. Phase 1 monitoring
evaluates whether the legal texts through which participants implement the Convention
meet the required standard. The purpose of Phase 2 is to study the structures put in place
to enforce the implementing laws and rules, and to assess their application in practice.
19
OECD 2000, 244.
20
OECD 2000, 245.
21
OECD 2000, 247.


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 9 of 26   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.