All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

East-Asianism vs. Asian-Pacificism: the Contested Process of Formation of a Regional Identity in Asia
Unformatted Document Text:  8 East Asia, because this region has suffered from a kind of ‘identity conflict’ as will be seen in the next section. I do not view however that constructivism alone can give us a satisfactory answer to this issue because the concept of a (regional) identity is empty without considering power relations or the distribution of material capabilities among major players in the region. As will be seen in what follows, power relations or the distribution of material capabilities have exerted a considerable influence on the (re)construction of a regional identity. Emerging Contested Regional Identities in Asia: East-Asianism vs. Asian-Pacificism Since the 14 th century, for almost 600 years many Asian countries had been under the influence of the Chinese empire. This traditional Sino-centric regional order collapsed in the 19 th century when China was replaced by Western imperial powers (especially the Great Britain). In the early 20 th century, Japan, which had succeeded in self-modernization in a fairly short time (less than 50 years), arose as a new regional power and at the same time as a “member of the imperialist club,” replacing China and Western powers in this region (Neary 2002, 18). Japanese- centered regionalism under the motto of the ‘Greater East Asian Co-prosperity Sphere’ was defeated at the end of World War II by the United States that emerged to a new superpower in world politics (Simone 2001, 378). During the Cold war era, many Asian states relied heavily upon the economic and military support of the U.S. against the threat of communism. Even in the post-Cold War era, it appears that the basic structure of the US-East Asian political-military relationship has not altered. 100,000 American ground forces are still stationed in East Asia and US-Japanese security arrangements are consolidated throughout the 1980s and 1990s. This displays that the United States remains a dominant military power in Asia (Katzenstein 2000, 3). It is noteworthy that Japan has emerged as a strategic partner of the U.S. in East Asia, acting as a leading economic power in this region under the military auspices of the United States. Along with this, there has been a growing role of Japan in ASEAN in the realms of trade, foreign

Authors: Choi, Ji Young.
first   previous   Page 9 of 27   next   last



background image
8
East Asia, because this region has suffered from a kind of ‘identity conflict’ as will be seen in the
next section.
I do not view however that constructivism alone can give us a satisfactory answer to this
issue because the concept of a (regional) identity is empty without considering power relations or
the distribution of material capabilities among major players in the region. As will be seen in
what follows, power relations or the distribution of material capabilities have exerted a
considerable influence on the (re)construction of a regional identity.
Emerging Contested Regional Identities in Asia: East-Asianism vs. Asian-Pacificism
Since the 14
th
century, for almost 600 years many Asian countries had been under the
influence of the Chinese empire. This traditional Sino-centric regional order collapsed in the 19
th
century when China was replaced by Western imperial powers (especially the Great Britain). In
the early 20
th
century, Japan, which had succeeded in self-modernization in a fairly short time
(less than 50 years), arose as a new regional power and at the same time as a “member of the
imperialist club,” replacing China and Western powers in this region (Neary 2002, 18). Japanese-
centered regionalism under the motto of the ‘Greater East Asian Co-prosperity Sphere’ was
defeated at the end of World War II by the United States that emerged to a new superpower in
world politics (Simone 2001, 378). During the Cold war era, many Asian states relied heavily
upon the economic and military support of the U.S. against the threat of communism. Even in the
post-Cold War era, it appears that the basic structure of the US-East Asian political-military
relationship has not altered. 100,000 American ground forces are still stationed in East Asia and
US-Japanese security arrangements are consolidated throughout the 1980s and 1990s. This
displays that the United States remains a dominant military power in Asia (Katzenstein 2000, 3).
It is noteworthy that Japan has emerged as a strategic partner of the U.S. in East Asia, acting
as a leading economic power in this region under the military auspices of the United States.
Along with this, there has been a growing role of Japan in ASEAN in the realms of trade, foreign


Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 9 of 27   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.