|
|
|
|
Old Concepts, New Actors: Public Goods, TNCs' Power and NGOs' Legitimacy - The Provision of the Public Good "Peace and Security" in Weak Zones of Governance |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
The Provision of public goods has been the central domain of states since the beginning of the modern state system. In the past century with an emphasis in the last decades various processes of globalization have led to a devolution of public authority to non-state actors. First, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) (here defined as non-profit civil society organisations) have become principal advocats and in some cases providers of public goods, because the state as a single actor and the international society as a collective does no longer fulfill this task (see Greenpeace and environmental protection, amnesty international and human rights protection, Oxfam and humanitarian aid). Having only limited material ressources at their disposal, but having immense moral legitimacy they contribute to the provision of national and global public goods. Second, transnational corporations (TNCs) have realized, that if states do not provide acceptable basic parameters, business opportunities are in jeopardy (see Shell in Nigeria, BP in Columbia, DaimlerChrysler in South Africa). Even the huge economic power of TNCs is not enough (reicht nicht aus) if an adequate infrastructure has not been set up and stable political conditions are not in place. In addition, by not always properly applying human rights and environmental standards TNCs' activities lack aspects of legitimacy and become at the same time targets of NGOs campaigns. The power and the legitimacy to provide public goods is somehow interwoven with three actors: the state, NGOs and TNCs. This paper seeks to explore the meaning and application of the concepts: public goods, power and legitimacy from the perspective of NGOs and TNCs. If the existence of private authority is reality, how do non-state actors make use of these concepts. What role do they assign to the state in this context? How do they deal with the assets that they do not possess (NGO - resources, TNC - legitimacy). And finally are the views of NGOs and TNCs compatible? Moreover from a theoretical standpoint, is there enough common ground for a new form of public-private authority? The theoretical argument will be confronted with empirical results of two surveys conducted with German based NGOs and German based TNCs in 2003 and 2004. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
public (82), state (82), good (62), global (52), secur (50), govern (45), actor (45), intern (42), privat (41), tncs (39), ngos (38), peac (37), process (36), diamond (33), power (30), 2004 (30), conflict (28), provis (27), kimberley (25), nation (23), legitimaci (22), |
Author's Keywords:
|
Business, TNC, NGOs, Public Goods, Power, Legitimacy, Kimberley Process, Partnership |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: International Studies Association URL: http://www.isanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Rieth, Lothar. "Old Concepts, New Actors: Public Goods, TNCs' Power and NGOs' Legitimacy - The Provision of the Public Good "Peace and Security" in Weak Zones of Governance" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Hilton Hawaiian Village, Honolulu, Hawaii, Mar 05, 2005 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p70797_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Rieth, L. , 2005-03-05 "Old Concepts, New Actors: Public Goods, TNCs' Power and NGOs' Legitimacy - The Provision of the Public Good "Peace and Security" in Weak Zones of Governance" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Hilton Hawaiian Village, Honolulu, Hawaii Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p70797_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: The Provision of public goods has been the central domain of states since the beginning of the modern state system. In the past century with an emphasis in the last decades various processes of globalization have led to a devolution of public authority to non-state actors. First, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) (here defined as non-profit civil society organisations) have become principal advocats and in some cases providers of public goods, because the state as a single actor and the international society as a collective does no longer fulfill this task (see Greenpeace and environmental protection, amnesty international and human rights protection, Oxfam and humanitarian aid). Having only limited material ressources at their disposal, but having immense moral legitimacy they contribute to the provision of national and global public goods. Second, transnational corporations (TNCs) have realized, that if states do not provide acceptable basic parameters, business opportunities are in jeopardy (see Shell in Nigeria, BP in Columbia, DaimlerChrysler in South Africa). Even the huge economic power of TNCs is not enough (reicht nicht aus) if an adequate infrastructure has not been set up and stable political conditions are not in place. In addition, by not always properly applying human rights and environmental standards TNCs' activities lack aspects of legitimacy and become at the same time targets of NGOs campaigns. The power and the legitimacy to provide public goods is somehow interwoven with three actors: the state, NGOs and TNCs. This paper seeks to explore the meaning and application of the concepts: public goods, power and legitimacy from the perspective of NGOs and TNCs. If the existence of private authority is reality, how do non-state actors make use of these concepts. What role do they assign to the state in this context? How do they deal with the assets that they do not possess (NGO - resources, TNC - legitimacy). And finally are the views of NGOs and TNCs compatible? Moreover from a theoretical standpoint, is there enough common ground for a new form of public-private authority? The theoretical argument will be confronted with empirical results of two surveys conducted with German based NGOs and German based TNCs in 2003 and 2004. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.pdf |
| Page count: |
17 |
| Word count: |
6349 |
| Text sample: |
| Old Concepts New Actors: Public Goods TNCs' Power and NGOs' Legitimacy The Provision of the Public Good "Peace and Security" in Weak Zones of Governance/ Zones of Conflict Lothar Rieth* University of Tuebingen Germany Lothar.Rieth@uni-tuebingen.de - Comments welcome - Paper for presentation at the panel "Transnationalism and Global Political Processes" at the 46th Annual International Studies Association Convention March 1-5 2005 Honolulu Hawaii. Table of Contents: 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 2 2. Public Goods and the System of Legal Certainty |
| and other Business Enterprises with regard to Human Rights Commission on Human Rights/Sub-Commission Resolution 2003/16 U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/L.11 at 52 (2003) August 13 2003. Van Rooy Alison (2004): The Global Legitimacy Game: Civil Society Globalization and Protest. Houndmills Basingstoke Hampshire [England] ; New York Palgrave Macmillan. 16 Waever Ole (1995): Securitization and Desecuritization. In: Ronnie D. Lipschutz (eds.). On Security. New York Columbia University Press: 46-86. Waltz Kenneth Neal (1979): Theory of International politics. Reading MA Addison- Wesley. 17 |
Similar Titles:
Bridging the Gap: A Return to the Historical Partnership between Academe and United States Government on Questions of Peace and Conflict Communication in International Security
From Westphalianism to Global Governance: The G8, International Law, and Global Health Governance Through Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs)
|
|