|
|
|
|
Balance of Power, Democracy, and Foreign Policy in South America's Southern Cone |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
The purpose of this paper is to assess the merits of two contending theories (balance of power and democratic peace) on the relationship between regime type (e.g., democratic or authoritarian) and foreign policy orientation (i.e., relative proneness towards conflict and cooperation) for the case of South America's Southern Cone between 1970 and 1995. Since it can be considered a distinctive sub-system within international politics, South America's Southern Cone provides a particularly suitable testing ground for balance of power theory. And since in the last few decades it has had consistent patterns of regime change (the last one of which Democratic Peace theorists characterize as a transition from authoritarian rule to democracy), it seems to provide a suitable testing ground for Democratic Peace theory. During the period under scrutiny, the only two instances of military conflict within the Southern Cone took place between countries with democratically elected governments (Ecuador and Peru in 1981 and 1995). I argue that these exceptions are significant because they indicate a problem with our understanding of these regimes, rather than with Democratic Peace theory: namely, that (contrary to what some of the theory's advocates claim) they are below the democratic threshold necessary for the application of the theory. This in turn tends to suggest that many attempts to test the theory beyond the industrialized democracies in the post-war era may be conceptually flawed. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
state (148), p (95), nation (74), militari (69), geopolit (59), war (51), polit (49), mean (48), secur (48), could (47), power (47), natur (47), intern (47), polici (44), within (44), darwin (43), relat (42), organ (41), howev (39), regim (38), boundari (38), |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: International Studies Association URL: http://www.isanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Kahhat, Farid. "Balance of Power, Democracy, and Foreign Policy in South America's Southern Cone" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Hilton Hawaiian Village, Honolulu, Hawaii, Mar 05, 2005 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p71084_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Kahhat, F. , 2005-03-05 "Balance of Power, Democracy, and Foreign Policy in South America's Southern Cone" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Hilton Hawaiian Village, Honolulu, Hawaii Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p71084_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to assess the merits of two contending theories (balance of power and democratic peace) on the relationship between regime type (e.g., democratic or authoritarian) and foreign policy orientation (i.e., relative proneness towards conflict and cooperation) for the case of South America's Southern Cone between 1970 and 1995. Since it can be considered a distinctive sub-system within international politics, South America's Southern Cone provides a particularly suitable testing ground for balance of power theory. And since in the last few decades it has had consistent patterns of regime change (the last one of which Democratic Peace theorists characterize as a transition from authoritarian rule to democracy), it seems to provide a suitable testing ground for Democratic Peace theory. During the period under scrutiny, the only two instances of military conflict within the Southern Cone took place between countries with democratically elected governments (Ecuador and Peru in 1981 and 1995). I argue that these exceptions are significant because they indicate a problem with our understanding of these regimes, rather than with Democratic Peace theory: namely, that (contrary to what some of the theory's advocates claim) they are below the democratic threshold necessary for the application of the theory. This in turn tends to suggest that many attempts to test the theory beyond the industrialized democracies in the post-war era may be conceptually flawed. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.PDF |
| Page count: |
82 |
| Word count: |
31900 |
| Text sample: |
| ABSTRACT: The overall topic of this paper is the relationship between regime type (e.g. democratic or authoritarian) and foreign policy orientation (i.e. relative proneness towards conflict and cooperation) for South America's Southern Cone. Its specific purpose is to offer an explanation of the relationship between regime type and foreign policy orientation in the 1970s. I will argue that unlike what we would expect from a balance of power perspective political regime is indeed crucial to understanding foreign policy orientation |
| of Games and the Balance of Power; World Politics; July 1986. Waltz Kenneth; Man the State and War A Theoretical Analysis; Columbia University Press; New York; 1959. Waltz Kenneth; Theory of International Politics; Mc Graw Hill Inc.; New York; 1979. Waltz Kenneth; Reflections on Theory of International Politics: A Response to My Critics; in Robert Keohane Ed.; Neorealism and its Critics; Columbia University Press; New York; 1986. Weber Max; The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism; Charles Scribner's |
Similar Titles:
History, Strategy, and Organizations: The Consequences of Revolutions in Military Affairs for the International Balance of Power and International Security Environment
Pandemic Influenza and National Security Policy: An Analysis of the State, International and Security through a 21st Century Threat
The Evolving Nature of Federal-State Relations: State Activism in Education, Drug Control, and Homeland Security Policy
Democratic Vs. Postrevolutionary Authoritarian Regimes: Organized Labor, Regime Formation and International Labor Politics in the United States and Mexico (1910-1940)
|
|