All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Japanese Nuclear Disarmament Policies, Practices and National Identity
Unformatted Document Text:  38 73 “ ‘95 Study: Japan and Nukes Don’t Mix,” Asahi Shimbun, February 20, 2003. 74 “Interview/Kuniko Inoguchi: U.S. should be the ‘Flag-Carrier’ for Disarmament,” Asahi Shimbun, May 3, 2002. 75 Masaru Tamamoto, “The Uncertainty of Self,” World Policy Journal, vol. 16, no. 2, Summer 1999, pp. 119- 128. 76 “Cheney Voices Arms-Race Fear,” The Japan Times Online, March 18, 2003. 77 The line between offensive and defensive weapons has become increasingly blurred with the continued advancement of military technologies. 78 “Japan No. 2 on Buyer List for U.S. Arms,” Yomiuri Shimbun, December 26, 2004. 79 In September 2004, the U.S. Defense Security Cooperation Agency notified Congress of Japan’s plans to buy 20 PAC-3 (Patriot Advanced-Capability-3) missiles and related equipment and services from theUnited States. The estimated cost of the purchases is $79 million. See Defense Security CooperationAgency, “Japan – Patriot Advanced Capability-3 (PAC) Guided Missiles,” News Release, Washington,D.C., September 7, 2004. 80 Information from the Japanese Defense Agency accessed at www.jda.go.jp/e/index_.htm. 81 Jennifer Lind, “Pacifism or Passing the Buck? Testing Theories of Japanese Security Policies,” International Security, vol. 29, no. 1, Summer 2004, pp. 92-121, especially pp. 117-118. 82 See the websites of the Atomic Energy Commission of Japan at http://aec.jst.go.jp/jicst/NC/eng and the Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute at www.jnc.go.jp/kaihatu/hukaku/English/atomiclaw.htm. 83 Yuri Kase, “Japan’s Nonnuclear Weapons Policy in the Changing Security Environment: Issues, Challenges and Strategies,” World Affairs, vol. 165, no. 3, Winter 2003, pp. 123-131. 84 See, for example, “China Arms Buildup Key Concern,” Asahi Shimbun, January 15, 2005. Conversely, Beijing worries about Japan’s increasing military interests. See “Who’s Threatening Whom?” BeijingReview, vol. 48, no. 2, January 13, 2005, pp. 20-21. 85 Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 2004 Diplomatic Bluebook (Tokyo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 2004), pp. 25-30. 86 “U.S. Experts Weigh Odds of Japan Going Nuclear,” The Japan Times Online, December 6, 2002. 87 Anthony DiFilippo, “How Tokyo’s Security Policies Discount Japanese Public Opinion: Toward an Alternative Security Agenda,” Pacifica Review: Peace, Security & Global Change, vol. 14, no. 1, February2002, pp, 23-48. 88 Peace Depot, Evaluating Implementation of the NPT 13+2 Steps: Japan’s Report Card on Nuclear Disarmament 2004, Yokohama, April 16, 2004; Peace Depot, Evaluating Implementation of the NPT 13+2Steps: Japan’s Report Card on Nuclear Disarmament 2003, Yokohama, April 18, 2003; Peace Depot,Evaluating Implementation of the NPT 13+2 Steps: Japan’s Report Card on Nuclear Disarmament 2002,Yokohama, March 27, 2002. 89 Survey data from “Let’s Send a Warning from the A-Bombed City,” The Chugoku Shimbun, August 6, 2001.

Authors: DiFilippo, Anthony.
first   previous   Page 38 of 38   next   last



background image
38
73
“ ‘95 Study: Japan and Nukes Don’t Mix,” Asahi Shimbun, February 20, 2003.
74
“Interview/Kuniko Inoguchi: U.S. should be the ‘Flag-Carrier’ for Disarmament,” Asahi Shimbun, May
3, 2002.
75
Masaru Tamamoto, “The Uncertainty of Self,” World Policy Journal, vol. 16, no. 2, Summer 1999, pp.
119- 128.
76
“Cheney Voices Arms-Race Fear,” The Japan Times Online, March 18, 2003.
77
The line between offensive and defensive weapons has become increasingly blurred with the continued
advancement of military technologies.
78
“Japan No. 2 on Buyer List for U.S. Arms,” Yomiuri Shimbun, December 26, 2004.
79
In September 2004, the U.S. Defense Security Cooperation Agency notified Congress of Japan’s plans to
buy 20 PAC-3 (Patriot Advanced-Capability-3) missiles and related equipment and services from the
United States. The estimated cost of the purchases is $79 million. See Defense Security Cooperation
Agency, “Japan – Patriot Advanced Capability-3 (PAC) Guided Missiles,” News Release, Washington,
D.C., September 7, 2004.
80
Information from the Japanese Defense Agency accessed at www.jda.go.jp/e/index_.htm.
81
Jennifer Lind, “Pacifism or Passing the Buck? Testing Theories of Japanese Security Policies,”
International Security, vol. 29, no. 1, Summer 2004, pp. 92-121, especially pp. 117-118.
82
See the websites of the Atomic Energy Commission of Japan at http://aec.jst.go.jp/jicst/NC/eng and the
Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute at www.jnc.go.jp/kaihatu/hukaku/English/atomiclaw.htm.
83
Yuri Kase, “Japan’s Nonnuclear Weapons Policy in the Changing Security Environment: Issues,
Challenges and Strategies,” World Affairs, vol. 165, no. 3, Winter 2003, pp. 123-131.
84
See, for example, “China Arms Buildup Key Concern,” Asahi Shimbun, January 15, 2005. Conversely,
Beijing worries about Japan’s increasing military interests. See “Who’s Threatening Whom?” Beijing
Review
, vol. 48, no. 2, January 13, 2005, pp. 20-21.
85
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 2004 Diplomatic Bluebook (Tokyo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 2004), pp.
25-30.
86
“U.S. Experts Weigh Odds of Japan Going Nuclear,” The Japan Times Online, December 6, 2002.
87
Anthony DiFilippo, “How Tokyo’s Security Policies Discount Japanese Public Opinion: Toward an
Alternative Security Agenda,” Pacifica Review: Peace, Security & Global Change, vol. 14, no. 1, February
2002, pp, 23-48.
88
Peace Depot, Evaluating Implementation of the NPT 13+2 Steps: Japan’s Report Card on Nuclear
Disarmament 2004, Yokohama, April 16, 2004; Peace Depot, Evaluating Implementation of the NPT 13+2
Steps: Japan’s Report Card on Nuclear Disarmament 2003
, Yokohama, April 18, 2003; Peace Depot,
Evaluating Implementation of the NPT 13+2 Steps: Japan’s Report Card on Nuclear Disarmament 2002,
Yokohama, March 27, 2002.
89
Survey data from “Let’s Send a Warning from the A-Bombed City,” The Chugoku Shimbun, August 6,
2001.


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 38 of 38   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.