All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

NATO's Southeast: Turkey, Russia and the Southern Caucasus
Unformatted Document Text:  9 As for economic relations, contracts were drawn up for cooperative ventures worth about $600 million, while Turkey agreed to provide grain either gratis or on favorable terms as Azerbaijan had trouble feeding over one million refugees from Armenian-occupied territories. In addition, there was discussion of a proposed oil pipeline from Baku to Ceyhan, on the Mediterranean coast of Turkey – for which Aliyev’s government had signed an accord in March 1993 and from which Turkish authorities had estimated they could earn as much as one billion dollars in transit taxes – as well as oil exploration rights in Azerbaijan; Aliyev expressed the hope that a $7.5 billion oil deal between the Azerbaijani State Oil Company (SOCAR) and a Western consortium led by British Petroleum with its 17% share and including Ramco also of Britain, four American oil companies, Norway’s Statoil, Itochu of Japan, Saudi Arabia’s Delta Nimir, and the Turkish State Petroleum Company (TPAO) could be concluded soon. The Azerbaijanis eventually signed an agreement in September 1994 that was initially contested by Russia. While Aliyev had granted the Russian oil company Lukoil a 10% share in the then-proposed oil consortium, shortly after he came to power, Russia wanted assurances that the oil would transit its territory to the Black Sea port of Novorossiysk. Until this was done, the Russians had argued that the Caspian was a “special inner sea” and that states located on its littoral could not act unilaterally with regard to its resources. (The 868-mile Caspian to Black Sea pipeline, which travels through Chechnya, was opened in November 1997.) Turkey voiced environmental concerns about the possibility of increased oil traffic through the Bosphorus and Dardanelles straits; it originally had proposed a pipeline which would transit Iran and Nakhichevan, but due to opposition in

Authors: Bishku, Michael.
first   previous   Page 9 of 12   next   last



background image
9
As for economic relations, contracts were drawn up for cooperative ventures
worth about $600 million, while Turkey agreed to provide grain either gratis or on
favorable terms as Azerbaijan had trouble feeding over one million refugees from
Armenian-occupied territories. In addition, there was discussion of a proposed oil
pipeline from Baku to Ceyhan, on the Mediterranean coast of Turkey – for which
Aliyev’s government had signed an accord in March 1993 and from which Turkish
authorities had estimated they could earn as much as one billion dollars in transit taxes –
as well as oil exploration rights in Azerbaijan; Aliyev expressed the hope that a $7.5
billion oil deal between the Azerbaijani State Oil Company (SOCAR) and a Western
consortium led by British Petroleum with its 17% share and including Ramco also of
Britain, four American oil companies, Norway’s Statoil, Itochu of Japan, Saudi Arabia’s
Delta Nimir, and the Turkish State Petroleum Company (TPAO) could be concluded
soon. The Azerbaijanis eventually signed an agreement in September 1994 that was
initially contested by Russia.
While Aliyev had granted the Russian oil company Lukoil a 10% share in the
then-proposed oil consortium, shortly after he came to power, Russia wanted assurances
that the oil would transit its territory to the Black Sea port of Novorossiysk. Until this
was done, the Russians had argued that the Caspian was a “special inner sea” and that
states located on its littoral could not act unilaterally with regard to its resources. (The
868-mile Caspian to Black Sea pipeline, which travels through Chechnya, was opened in
November 1997.) Turkey voiced environmental concerns about the possibility of
increased oil traffic through the Bosphorus and Dardanelles straits; it originally had
proposed a pipeline which would transit Iran and Nakhichevan, but due to opposition in


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 9 of 12   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.