All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Satellite States - Transatlantic Conflict and the Galileo System
Unformatted Document Text:  Bastian Giegerich Draft – not for citation Karner, Julie (2003): The Global Positioning System: International Cooperation, March 2003. Larsen, Paul B. (2001): Issues Relating to Civilian and Military Dual Uses of GNSS, in: Space Policy 17, pp. 111-119. Lembke, Johan (2002): EU Critical Infrastructure and Security Policy: Capabilities, Strategies and Vulnerabilities, in: Current Politics and Economics of Europe 11(2), pp. 99-129. Lewis, James Andrew (2004): Galileo and GPS: From Competition to Cooperation. Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, DC, June 2004. Lindström, Gustav (2004): The Moment of Truth for Galileo, in Security Dialogue 35(1), pp. 117-119. Lindström, Gustav and Giovanni Gasparini (2003): The Galileo Satellite System and its Security Implications. Occasional Paper No 44, European Union Institute for Security Studies: Paris. Minder, Raphael (2005): China’s Focus on Galileo Pinpoints US Security Fears, in: Financial Times, 24 February 2005, p. 16. Morris, Jefferson (2004): U.S. Proposes Compromise on Galileo Signal Structure, in: Aerospace Daily 209(4), p. 1. Süddeutsche Zeitung (2003): Neue Orientierung für das alte Europa, 1 April 2003, p. 20. ----- (2004): EU und USA legen Streit um ‚Galileo’ bei, 26 February 2004, p. 21. Swider, Raymond (2003): Contribution to GPS World Annual Directions Essays on: GNSS Interoperability: Future of Fantasy?, in: GPS World 14(12). Taverna, Michael A. and Robert Wall (2004): Despite some Progress, Discussions on GPS-Galileo Interference are still in a Stall, in: Aviation Week & Space Technology 160(2), p. 49. US Department of State (2004): U.S., EU Optimistic About Satellite Navigation Agreement. Washington File 19 February 2004. ----- (2004): Remarks by Braibanti, Hilbrecht on GPS/Galileo Agreement. Washington File 27 February 2004. Wheeler, Scott L. (2004): Europe Attacks U.S. Space System, in: Insight on the News, 1 March 2004, p. 23. 19

Authors: Giegerich, Bastian.
first   previous   Page 19 of 19   next   last



background image
Bastian Giegerich
Draft – not for citation
Karner, Julie (2003): The Global Positioning System: International Cooperation, March
2003.
Larsen, Paul B. (2001): Issues Relating to Civilian and Military Dual Uses of GNSS, in:
Space Policy 17, pp. 111-119.
Lembke, Johan (2002): EU Critical Infrastructure and Security Policy: Capabilities,
Strategies and Vulnerabilities, in: Current Politics and Economics of Europe
11(2), pp. 99-129.
Lewis, James Andrew (2004): Galileo and GPS: From Competition to Cooperation.
Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, DC, June 2004.
Lindström, Gustav (2004): The Moment of Truth for Galileo, in Security Dialogue
35(1), pp. 117-119.
Lindström, Gustav and Giovanni Gasparini (2003): The Galileo Satellite System and its
Security Implications. Occasional Paper No 44, European Union Institute for
Security Studies: Paris.
Minder, Raphael (2005): China’s Focus on Galileo Pinpoints US Security Fears, in:
Financial Times, 24 February 2005, p. 16.
Morris, Jefferson (2004): U.S. Proposes Compromise on Galileo Signal Structure, in:
Aerospace Daily 209(4), p. 1.
Süddeutsche Zeitung (2003): Neue Orientierung für das alte Europa, 1 April 2003, p.
20.
----- (2004): EU und USA legen Streit um ‚Galileo’ bei, 26 February 2004, p. 21.
Swider, Raymond (2003): Contribution to GPS World Annual Directions Essays on:
GNSS Interoperability: Future of Fantasy?, in: GPS World 14(12).
Taverna, Michael A. and Robert Wall (2004): Despite some Progress, Discussions on
GPS-Galileo Interference are still in a Stall, in: Aviation Week & Space
Technology 160(2), p. 49.
US Department of State (2004): U.S., EU Optimistic About Satellite Navigation
Agreement. Washington File 19 February 2004.
----- (2004): Remarks by Braibanti, Hilbrecht on GPS/Galileo Agreement. Washington
File 27 February 2004.
Wheeler, Scott L. (2004): Europe Attacks U.S. Space System, in: Insight on the News, 1
March 2004, p. 23.
19


Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 19 of 19   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.