All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

The Legitimacy of Consolidating Judiciary in Latin America: Survey Evidence from Chile, Costa Rica, and Mexico
Unformatted Document Text:  33 Table 7. Judicial Differentiation and Judicial Confidence by Political Party and Ideology Confidence in the Judiciary Confidence in the Judiciary %responding %responding %responding %responding % responding %responding %responding %responding %responding with much/ with much/ with much/ with much/ with much/ with much/ with much/ with much/ with much/ some some some some some some some some some confidence confidence confidence confidence confidence confidence confidence confidence confidence Chile _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Political Party Political Ideology Judiciary PDC RN UDI Other Independent Center Left Right No Differentiated 31.0 n=134 47.0 n=66 40.0 n=40 31.0 n=96 33.0 n=216 32.0 n=251 27.0 n=77 45.0 n=105 34.0 n=119 No Difference 66.0 n=137 52.0 n=46 55.0 n=55 36.0 n=138 38.0 n=247 54.0 n=271 36.0 n=97 51.0 n=122 32.0 n=133 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Total Confid 48.3 n= 271 49.1 n=112 48.4 n=95 33.8 n=234 35.4 n=463 1175 43.6 n=522 32.1 n=174 48.0 n=227 32.5 n=252 Costa Rica ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Political Party Political Ideology Judiciary PUSC PLN Other or No Center Left Right No Differentiated 58.0 n=163 53.0 n=147 57.0 n=152 52.0 n=148 67.0 n=24 57.0 n=182 56.0 n=108 No Difference 52.0 n=205 48.0 n=164 31.0 n=131 34.0 n=137 23.0 n=22 47.0 n=189 57.0 n=152 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Total Confid 54.6 n=368 49.8 n=311 44.9 n=283 962 43.5 n=285 45.7 n=46 51.5 n=371 56.5 n=260 Mexico _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Political Party Political Ideology Judiciary PRI PAN PRD Other or No Center Left Right No Differentiated 35.0 n=215 37.0 n=131 40.0 n=167 29.0 n=113 36.0 n=290 29.0 n=89 41.0 n=183 30.0 n=64 No Difference 39.0 n=174 16.0 n=91 19.0 n=105 26.0 n=95 28.0 n=219 23.0 n=77 28.0 n=115 30.0 n=54 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Total Confid 37.0 n=389 28.4 n=222 32.0 n=272 27.9 n=208 1091 32.8 n=509 26.5 n=166 35.9 n=298 29.7 n=118 The Differentiated category is individual who differentiate level of judicial confidence from level of confidence in the government. No Difference category is individuals who do not differentiate level of judicial confidence from level of governmental confidence. The figure reported is percentage of individuals who respond with much or some confidence. n is the number of people responding in the categorical grouping.

Authors: Davis, Charles. and Walker, Lee.
first   previous   Page 33 of 33   next   last



background image
33
Table 7. Judicial Differentiation and Judicial Confidence by Political Party and Ideology
Confidence in the Judiciary Confidence in the Judiciary
%responding %responding %responding %responding % responding
%responding
%responding
%responding
%responding
with much/ with much/ with much/ with much/ with much/
with much/
with much/
with much/
with much/
some some some some
some
some
some
some
some
confidence confidence confidence confidence confidence
confidence
confidence
confidence
confidence
Chile
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Political Party
Political Ideology
Judiciary
PDC RN UDI Other
Independent Center
Left
Right
No
Differentiated 31.0 n=134 47.0 n=66 40.0 n=40 31.0 n=96 33.0 n=216
32.0 n=251
27.0 n=77
45.0 n=105
34.0 n=119
No Difference 66.0 n=137 52.0 n=46 55.0 n=55 36.0 n=138 38.0 n=247
54.0 n=271
36.0 n=97
51.0 n=122
32.0 n=133
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Total Confid
48.3 n= 271 49.1 n=112 48.4 n=95 33.8 n=234 35.4 n=463 1175
43.6 n=522
32.1 n=174
48.0 n=227
32.5 n=252
Costa Rica
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Political Party Political Ideology
Judiciary
PUSC
PLN
Other or No
Center
Left
Right
No
Differentiated 58.0 n=163
53.0 n=147
57.0 n=152
52.0 n=148
67.0 n=24
57.0 n=182
56.0 n=108
No Difference 52.0 n=205
48.0 n=164
31.0 n=131
34.0 n=137
23.0 n=22
47.0 n=189
57.0 n=152
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Total Confid
54.6 n=368
49.8 n=311
44.9 n=283
962
43.5 n=285
45.7 n=46
51.5 n=371
56.5 n=260
Mexico
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Political Party Political Ideology
Judiciary
PRI
PAN
PRD
Other or No
Center
Left
Right
No
Differentiated 35.0 n=215
37.0 n=131
40.0 n=167
29.0 n=113
36.0 n=290
29.0 n=89
41.0 n=183
30.0 n=64
No Difference 39.0 n=174
16.0 n=91
19.0 n=105
26.0 n=95
28.0 n=219
23.0 n=77
28.0 n=115
30.0 n=54
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Total Confid
37.0 n=389
28.4 n=222
32.0 n=272
27.9 n=208
1091
32.8 n=509
26.5 n=166
35.9 n=298
29.7 n=118
The Differentiated category is individual who differentiate level of judicial confidence from level of confidence in the government. No Difference category is individuals who do not differentiate level of
judicial confidence from level of governmental confidence. The figure reported is percentage of individuals who respond with much or some confidence. n is the number of people responding in the
categorical grouping.


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 33 of 33   next   last

©2012 All Academic, Inc.