 |
Determinants of Minority Nominations for the U.S. Courts of Appeals
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
________________________________________________________________________ * I appreciate the advice and assistance of Paul Wahlbeck, Sarah Binder, Forrest Maltzman, and Langche Zeng. Additionally, David Lublin provided helpful guidance in updating his data for a few key independent variables in my analysis.
Determinants of Minority Nominations for the U.S. Courts of Appeals
*
Mitchell Killian
George Washington University
## email not listed ##
Annual Meeting of the
Southwestern Political Science Association
New Orleans, March 23
rd
– 26
th
, 2005
My paper provides an analysis of which factors increase the likelihood of a
minority being nominated for a seat on the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Drawing on a
variety of datasets, I model several variables that affect this process. Specifically,
I show that presidential ideology and minority representation in the U.S. House of
Representatives influence the likelihood of minority nominations to the U.S.
Courts of Appeals.
|
| | Authors: Killian, Mitchell. |
|
| |
|
|
________________________________________________________________________
* I appreciate the advice and assistance of Paul Wahlbeck, Sarah Binder, Forrest Maltzman, and
Langche Zeng. Additionally, David Lublin provided helpful guidance in updating his data for a
few key independent variables in my analysis.
Determinants of Minority Nominations for the U.S. Courts of Appeals
*
Mitchell Killian
George Washington University
## email not listed ##
Annual Meeting of the
Southwestern Political Science Association
New Orleans, March 23
rd
– 26
th
, 2005
My paper provides an analysis of which factors increase the likelihood of a
minority being nominated for a seat on the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Drawing on a
variety of datasets, I model several variables that affect this process. Specifically,
I show that presidential ideology and minority representation in the U.S. House of
Representatives influence the likelihood of minority nominations to the U.S.
Courts of Appeals.
|
|
 Convention | | All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 22 
